User talk:Uranium Site: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 120.17.212.195 (talk) (HG) (3.4.10)
120.17.212.195 (talk)
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments,_notices,_and_warnings I regularly empty this page]. If anyone has doubts about my credibility and transparency, they can make the effort to analyze critically the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Uranium_Site&action=history history] of this page. [[User:Uranium Site|Uranium Site]] ([[User talk:Uranium Site#top|talk]]) 20:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments,_notices,_and_warnings I regularly empty this page















]. If anyone has doubts about my credibility and transparency, they can make the effort to analyze critically the


[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Uranium_Site&action=history history] of this page. [[User:Uranium Site|Uranium Site]] ([[User talk:Uranium Site#top|talk]]) 20:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)


Yes, I am testing edits. I thought I was using sandbox my apologies. Also could not notice that there were some factual discrepancies with the career and certain narrative was present that did not represented the full truth. This seems to be the norm on the Wiki nowadays it seems.
Yes, I am testing edits. I thought I was using sandbox my apologies. Also could not notice that there were some factual discrepancies with the career and certain narrative was present that did not represented the full truth. This seems to be the norm on the Wiki nowadays it seems.

Revision as of 08:39, 30 September 2021

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments,_notices,_and_warnings I regularly empty this page








]. If anyone has doubts about my credibility and transparency, they can make the effort to analyze critically the


history of this page. Uranium Site (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am testing edits. I thought I was using sandbox my apologies. Also could not notice that there were some factual discrepancies with the career and certain narrative was present that did not represented the full truth. This seems to be the norm on the Wiki nowadays it seems.

I think the warning is too late

Very likely, I will be banned for a while, on the spot that an admin reacts. Please do not give warnings about "possible" bans, while they are on the way. But no problem. Billy Porter has provoked me. He was the originator. 62.216.206.173 (talk) 10:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jellingthirtyseven

If you're an admin just block Jellingthirtyseven. It is another sockpuppet of Jellington. There is a category for sockpuppets of Jellington. I'm not an admin, but an IP ban needs to happen. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't warn Jellington accounts. Again, just ban them if you are an admin. They are sock puppets for the purpose of vandalism. I don't know how you haven't gotten that yet. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 21:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i will do exactly as you instructed for the Brendan McFarlane page. Also the part that i replaced DID NOT HAVE A REFERENCE AnD STILL DOES NOT HAVE A REFERENCE!

Horbury

I tried to edit the Horbury, Wakefield entry but it went a bit wrong on my phone deleting too much. The bit I did want to take out though I explained it was irrelevant to the entry as its generic information not specifically for the area but the city as a whole.

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping to protect my talk page from a vandal. Much appreciated. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]