1951 United States Supreme Court case
Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the city of Havre de Grace, Maryland had violated the free exercise of Niemotko's religion by not issuing a permit for him and his religious group (the Jehovah's Witnesses) to meet in a public park when other religious and civic groups had been given permits for holding their meetings there.[1]
References
External links
- Text of Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist
Unprotected speech |
| ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strict scrutiny | |||||||||||||
Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines | |||||||||||||
Symbolic speech versus conduct |
| ||||||||||||
Content-based restrictions |
| ||||||||||||
Content-neutral restrictions |
| ||||||||||||
Compelled speech |
| ||||||||||||
Compelled subsidy of others' speech |
| ||||||||||||
Government grants and subsidies | |||||||||||||
Government speech |
| ||||||||||||
Loyalty oaths |
| ||||||||||||
School speech |
| ||||||||||||
Public employees |
| ||||||||||||
Hatch Act and similar laws | |||||||||||||
Licensing and restriction of speech |
| ||||||||||||
Commercial speech |
| ||||||||||||
Campaign finance and political speech |
| ||||||||||||
Anonymous speech |
| ||||||||||||
State action |
| ||||||||||||
Official retaliation |
| ||||||||||||
Boycotts | |||||||||||||
Prisons |
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.