This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Council This page relates to the WikiProject Council, a collaborative effort regarding WikiProjects in general. If you would like to participate, please visit the project discussion page.CouncilWikipedia:WikiProject CouncilTemplate:WikiProject CouncilCouncil Article quality research (inactive) This page is within the scope of the article quality research project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Article quality researchWikipedia:WikiProject Article quality researchTemplate:Quality assessmentArticle quality research Wikipedia This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia

A short while ago, Cewbot went through all of the categories tagged for the WP:Lichen task force, and removed "redundant" parameters, including "class=category", and "class=redirect". As a consequence, 100's of articles are now missing from the "Category" and "Redirect" totals displayed in the assessment progression box (which is the reason we put those parameters there in the first place). Is there any way get get these back in our totals, short of manually putting back in the parameter and opting out of the banner shell template? Esculenta (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there's a discussion about adding another class at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#D class?, everyone is welcome to contribute. Apologies if this has been discussed to conclusion anywhere but I can't see anything in any archives about it. Kowal2701 (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A is rarely used so I think c start and stub are enough bc start kind of acts like a d class and stub acts as an e/f class TropicalGalaxy (talk) 13:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First off can an article be a and ga or just one also which one is higher a or ga and why are there so few a articles? TropicalGalaxy (talk) 13:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TropicalGalaxy, A-Class is paradoxically higher than a Good Article (GA). There are so few such A-class articles or better, because folks (1) like to create articles because it's a quick way to get that "dopamine rush", (2) only have the time, energy, or temperament to make small changes and fixes, but (3) often don't have the time, energy, or temperament necessary for making big changes. There's politically incorrect reasons for that phenomenon. For example, it's taking me months to improve dress code. By the way, can you assess it? Please and thank you. Bearian (talk) 12:50, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I didn't see that you changed your user name to OrangeLolipopSnail. Bearian (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But wouldn't A be easier to get than GA because for A just 2 people have to agree but for GA an admin or something like that (I forgot the name) has to review it. OrangeLolipopSnail (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going through as many Law stubs as I possibly can this year, with a view at more accurately assessing Start- and C-class articles mislabeled as law-stubs, or never assessed at all. I've come across many articles about legislation and court cases with a seal or flag (especially UK or US) in the Infobox. Does that count as a "graphic" as defined by the Start-class criteria or factor? Yes or no, as as the attorney cross-examining a hostile witness says. I know that you are not hostile; I just want to efficiently get through assessment of 16,700-plus stubs. Bearian (talk) 12:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]