The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Greenmarketsquare (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one article, Greenmarket Square. I suggest substituting it on the article and deleting. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 23:43, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How else can I create an interactive map for a Wikipedia article, like this, without it being a template? If it can only be done using a template then the policy arbitrarily prevents individual articles from having such a map. If not, then I am happy to create the map in non-template form. Discott (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and subst per nom. Vestrian24Bio 06:04, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Background information for presidential elections in Maryland from 1796 to 1820 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:TG, "Templates should not normally be used to store article text...". I don't see why we can't place the content of this template into United States presidential elections in Maryland or another article, and use labeled section transclusion and/or {{Excerpt}} to transclude the text. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 17:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 06:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I was unaware of that rule and fine with the information being moved, but the same text was used across a number of similar pages and felt like setting up for failure to get out-of-sync by having text that was intended to be identical across multiple articles. —Ost (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete by substing. This is one of those things where the article should be allowed to develop freely, and in general I would be concerned about that much of the exact same text appearing on every single one of those transclusions for WP:POV reasons if nothing else. What's important to each probably is not that important to the other over the span of 25 years. Izno (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Editnotices/Page/Stockholm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created 15 years ago and last changed the year after, I don't find this edit notice template matching the low contentiousness of the topic of today. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 23:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 06:02, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Libertarianism in Scotland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

To be frank, I think this might be the most pointless navbox I've ever come across on this website. It is describing a "series" on a subject that doesn't even have its own Wikipedia article. It contains only 7 links in total, with half of its lists only having a single entry. Most of the articles linked don't have any verifiable connection to the subject of "libertarianism in Scotland"; the articles on the Age of Enlightenment, Adam Smith, David Hume and The Wealth of Nations never mention the ideology once. What you have left after you trim these are three articles: UKIP, a British party that never gained any elected representation in Scotland, let alone could be described as an exemplar of "libertarianism in Scotland"; the Scottish Libertarian Party, a fringe political party which has never managed to gain more than a fraction of a percentage of the vote; and Mark Meechan, a Nazi YouTuber turned failed political candidate for the previous two parties. At best, this sidebar is tying together a small handful of disconnected topics. At worst, it could appear to be an attempt to legitimise fringe viewpoints by connecting them with subjects of much greater importance. Bluntly, the scope of this sidebar ranges from synthetic to pathetic.

Apologies to the creator for roasting this template so much, as I think it's clear they're trying to improve navigability in good faith. But I have to recommend this template for deletion, as I think right now its existence is, at best, unhelpful; at worst, it could be actively harmful to our readers' understanding of these subjects. Grnrchst (talk) 10:35, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 11:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, I accept your constructive criticism, however I do believe that it is quite a stretch to describe Meechan as a "Nazi", he is a paleolibertarian with a particularly edgy sense of humour. Uglytriangle999 (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NavigationCanadianFigureSkatingChampionsFours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unhelpful template; long-obsolete competition, held sporadically, way too clunky to be navigable. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do not see why this template is " too clunky to be navigable". The fact that the competition is discontinued, does not make the navigation template useless. The Banner talk 15:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:39, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 09:34, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Glenn Youngkin series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, undocumented template that links to only three articles that are distinct from the main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unnecessary. Vestrian24Bio 09:35, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Indian Premier League. Izno (talk) 23:51, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:IPL cricketers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Indian Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:IPL cricketers with Template:Indian Premier League.
No need for a separate navbox. Vestrian24Bio 04:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 March 22. Izno (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2013_CT_TOTT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2017_CT_TOTT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Men's T20 World Cup winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ICC Champions Trophy winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ICC World Test Championship winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Indian Premier League winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ACC Asia Cup winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cricket World Cup winning captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No need for a navbox to winning captains; adds no navigational usage. Vestrian24Bio 04:03, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated {{Cricket World Cup winning captains}} too. Vestrian24Bio 06:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep: Like Template:Cricket World Cup winning captains and Template:FIFA World Cup winning captains, these articles serve their purpose likewise. Pharaoh496 (talk) 19:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are WP:TCREEP as well. Vestrian24Bio 10:22, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This seems to be createing navboxes for their own sake, and I don't think there is enough discussion of these players as a group to justify them. They woould also seem to fail items 3,4 and 5 in WP:NAVBOX. Spike 'em (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Don Bradman series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Sachin Tendulkar series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Brian Lara series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shane Warne series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Arvind Kejriwal series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just a few links, a navbox is enough, no need for a sidebar series. Vestrian24Bio 03:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• comment, {{Don Bradman series}} connects 17 articles, what is the duplicate navbox? Frietjes (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  What I meant is it could be converted to a navbox, which would serve the same purpose, while taking up less space in the article page. Vestrian24Bio 06:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  nope, its serving its purpose here like countless other sidebars Pharaoh496 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep: These are serving as a sidebar and precisely doing what they are intended to. Inspiration was taken for the cricket articles from those of other sportspersons. (Personal note to @Vestrian24Bio: I am not formally accusing you of anything, but for someone who traditionally works in Cricket, your pointing out of the Arvind Kejriwal article like so many of the articles and templates made and edited by me point roads towards WP:HOUND, something not appreciated as all of them hold considerable amount of merit.) Pharaoh496 (talk) 03:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cork Hurling Team Early 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No idea what team this is: the "original" team or the strike breakers. Template only links to an article over the player strike. The Banner talk 03:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It does say "(replacements for strikers)". And did so at the time of the nomination. Ray Ryan, who died last month, is the captain. Another clue is that Dónal Óg Cusack is not the goalkeeper. He is not mentioned at all. But "(replacements for strikers)" probably covers it well enough.

I find it interesting that the other problem here is that the template "only links to an article over the player strike". That is another inconsistency. The absence of a linked article is normally one of the arguments for deletion... --Gaois (talk) 01:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have been inaccurate or unclear. The backlink, 2008–2009 Cork senior hurling team strike, does not contain any information over the players involved other then the navigation template, making this team hang in the air. The Banner talk 02:56, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:NENAN. Vestrian24Bio 09:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.