March 23

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 23, 2025.

Indo-European peoples

This redirect was recently retargeted to simple:Indo-European peoples, but I'm not sure that's the right call. The redirect was targeted to Proto-Indo-Europeans for several years, and I'm inclined to restore that as it seems to cover the same topic. I note that the editor who retargeted the redirect has been heavily involved with editing the simple wiki page. Zeibgeist (talk) 19:08, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dickapedia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 4#Dickapedia

Thailand national under-18 and under-19 basketball team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: Wikipedia:XY – the under-19 team is not discussed at these targets. Maiō T. (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Barnet Ladies

Ambiguous name, as could easily refer to Barnet F.C. Ladies. Redlink to encourage searching or a DAB page are better. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Terror Tales of the Park

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting for deletion; I have created a draft for this article that includes information on the episode available nowhere else on Wikipedia, and the target page does not expand on the episode at all, letting the draft be turned into a page and deleting the redirect would be for the best of the episode Regularrrr0 (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is procedurally unnecessary, if the draft is accepted the redirect will be speedy deleted per {{db-move}}.. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect was never tagged for RFD. I have just tagged it. mwwv converse∫edits 12:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait no, it was untagged by the creator. @Regularrrr0, does that mean you're withdrawing the nomination? mwwv converse∫edits 12:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think I accidentally pressed something on the redirect? If I did, apologies. I still have the draft waiting for approval, if that’s what you’re asking Regularrrr0 (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think I misread your comment. Yes, since I realized I made a lapse in judgment, I withdrew my deletion nomination Regularrrr0 (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Regularrrr0: for future reference, the way to withdraw an XfD nomination is to explicitly state in the discussion that you wish to withdraw it. Thryduulf (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DXMA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"DXMA" is not mentioned at any of the target articles, making these redirects confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

3002 (number)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike other redirects to the same article, these recently created ones are from numbers for which there is no relevant information at the target. Not useful, as well as potentially setting a bad precedent for (a very large quantity of) similar redirects. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:E

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. This page is a pointless redirect with no reason to be retained. It also has some history of incorrect draft submissions (1, 2, 3) and unconstructive editing (1, 2). Furthermore, all other single-letter redirects from the draft namespace have been deleted (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26), and all except Draft:C have been salted to prevent future recreations. For consistency, this page should be treated the same way. Xoontor (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and enhance salting mechanisms Nothing more that needs to be said, useless draft redirect with a history of unconstructive editing. Suspiciously similar to the Draft:Minecraft situation.... User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 12:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Freedom bread

Not mentioned at the target or at List of breads. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the association is unknown ("freedom breads" pop up in search, but not popular and not French), so the redirect is very confusing. Was it a failed attempt to create a mem of the freedom fries variety? Викидим (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added these two cites and mentioned Freedom bread at Freedom fries#U.S. House adoption, where Freedom fries and Freedom toast are explained. This seems to be the most natural place for it rather than List of French breads. Enix150 (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eye twitch

Should retarget to Myokymia along with Eye twitching. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 01:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled Eye twitching.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? I believe Danski14's "Keep" !vote actually implies "retarget", hence this relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It would be good if the articles could highlight the differences rather than just have a hatnote saying that the concepts are different. Is disambiguation an option (including fasciculation, which is also in the hatnote)? Note that there are also Eyelid twitch, Eyelid twitching, Eyelid twitches, and Eye spasm (probably twitching eye and twitching eyelid could also be created once a target is decided). 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is also Twitchy eye, which points to fasciculation rather than blepharospasm. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liberia national under-23 football team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The redirect was made by the vandal Shafiqabu. The redirect is misleading because the U23 team is not mentioned anywhere in the target article. Another reason to delete is to make move for an actual article on the subject. Geschichte (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shoreline Bluff

Term was part of a mostly WP:OR strategy guide removed from the article in 2017 (per Talk:Stratego#Strategy section from article - unsourced), this particular term being given no source. No longer a useful redirect. Belbury (talk) 11:25, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vexatious

Not sure this should redirect here, as there are other (non-legal) uses for the term "vexatious", so probably best to delete.

We also have Frivolous or vexatious as a separate article on Wikipedia. GnocchiFan (talk) 08:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperoestrogenisation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hyperestrogenism. Jay 💬 11:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not seem to discuss this condition, and the only article mentioning it is long-term effects of alcohol. (Note that there is also no such redirects for the other variant spellings hyperestrogenisation or hyperestrogenization, which should probably be created in case this one is retained.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:52, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Boli (steroid)

This is mentioned at List of doping cases in sport by substance#Metenolone esters but not at the target. Given that the article that was located under this title prior to being merged/BLARed started with is the term Alex Rodriguez used to describe..., it seems that redirecting to a description of that particular case would be appropriate. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire steroid

No mention of this term at the target, neither of the properties of the chemical that the term is based on. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:38, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The redirect author added mention of the term today at Trenbolone#Environmental persistence. Good research, but 'vampire steroid' seems to have been a tool for making headlines rather than anything else. I don't see any harm in keeping with the added mention though. ⇌ Synpath 00:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polyglandular

A Wiktionary redirect to wikt:polyglandular might be more helpful to a reader less familiar with prefices, since this specific term is not mentioned at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pluriglandular disease

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Section no longer exists, and there does not seem any content in our articles that would provide information about this to readers. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Timme syndrome

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . TheSandDoctor Talk 06:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this section has been removed, and the only mention of this in an article is an entry at List of causes of hypoglycemia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of

Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 October 2#List of, though consensus was not quite clear; no reference to that discussion in the recreation though. Right now this appears at the top of the search box when entering "List of", which I imagine is more confusing than helpful. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is. The redirect target at the time of the 2016 discussion was List of lists of lists. When a new redirect was created in 2020, it was to a different target, List, which was then a disambiguation page, and is now a substantive article on the concept of a list. For a reader actually linking or searching for the exact phrase, "List of", this seems to be a perfectly fine result. BD2412 T 16:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a hatnote similar to that found at List of lists of lists which directs people to where they can find lists on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The use of the phrase "List of" on Wikipedia is incredibly meta to Wikipedia; as a search term used by readers, the redirect is not a plausible one as both an incomplete phrase and leaves the question "list of ... WHAT?" Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I completely disagree with the first part of your assertion - this is a plausible search term for someone looking for either encyclopaedic information about lists of things (the current target) or an index to lists of things (to be linked in my proposed hatnote). The unspecified topic of the list is exactly why this is not being proposed to target a specific individual list but an index to them. Thryduulf (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Frankly I do not see this being a plausible search term in this conspicuously incomplete form. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the target of the previous Rfd - List of lists of lists. That was a decade back, and consensus can change, and as the nomination says: "consensus was not quite clear". I find "List of" analogous to List of things or List of entities or List index, all of which redirect to my proposed target. Jay 💬 12:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of hills of the Falkland Islands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of mountains and hills of the Falkland Islands exists; however, that is not a list of lists, so this title with the plural seems implausible either way. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DXIP

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 30#DXIP

Δ1-Androstenediol

Not mentioned at target. Not sure whether this refers to 1-Androstenediol or anything else, but this has zero results that are unrelated to Wikipedia in web searches. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are supposed to be to 1-androstenediol. They're chemical synonyms. Apparently I made them directed to hormone 10 years ago, not sure why. Maybe mistake. Have updated the targets. Thanks. – AlyInWikiWonderland (talk, contribs) 04:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. As far as I can tell this name has been used once in web searchable literature: this 1957 paper. Otherwise it isn't listed as a synonym at PubChem or DrugBank. I don't think this can be listed as a valid synonym at 1-androstenediol and can be deleted for that. Though I don't think this redirect existing is particularly harmful, so, meh. ⇌ Synpath 00:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

María Guadalupe Guzmán

María Guadalupe Guzmán (with a diacritic above the i in María) is the correct name of this person. I'm nominating this deletion so I can move Maria Guadalupe Guzmán (without the diacritic) here. Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please use {{Db-move}}. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Or just list it at WP:RMTR 35.139.154.158 (talk) 04:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apohormone

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 3#Apohormone

Allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_23
No tags for this post.