The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SfnNoRef → Template:Harvard citation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I cannot comprehend why anyone looking up or transcluding this title would be intending to arrive at or transclude the target template. (This redirect currently has no transclusions.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This template was created in error due to confusion around what {{harvnb}} does. It was then made into redirect, but it probably should have been deleted back then. For background see: Template_talk:Sfn/Archive_1#A_version_of_Sfn_that_does_not_create_a_ref_tag_round_it. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as it's unused. Completely confusing in it's naming and it's target. Looking at the history I agree this should have been deleted earlier. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 02:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sfnc → Template:Harvc  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect has existed for less than a year. This seems like an obscure redirect to point towards the target template. With the exception of one or two templates that start with "Sfn" in its name, most of the templates beginning with "Sfn" are templates intended to produce a reference-like superscript link; the target template, {{Harvc}}, produces full-sized text. Also, this redirect has no transclusions, so I am assuming this redirect was created for the convenience of its creator. Otherwise, the title of this redirect seems to create more problems than it solves. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why I created this redirect :V. It's clearly not useful, so feel free to delete. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 01:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Chinese Nationalist Revolution → Northern Expedition  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

See zh:國民革命, the term has a specific meaning in historical discourse and does not necessarily refer to the Northern Expedition and more often refers to the 1911 Revolution if any subject with an article on the English Wikipedia comes close. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• India at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Only listed under participants at the target, without additional relevant information that one would expect if they were searching for this title. WP:RETURNTORED to encourage article creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Damned Don't Cry. Jay 💬 08:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The Damned Don't Cry (film) → The Damned Don't Cry (2022 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misleading. There are two films with this title: The Damned Don't Cry (primary topic) and The Damned Don't Cry (2022 film). Cavarrone 16:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Either retarget to The Damned Don't Cry as a {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} or Disambiguate. Deletion would bring no benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf, maybe I wasn't clear enough: there are two films with this title: The Damned Don't Cry (primary topic) and The Damned Don't Cry (2022 film). Retargeting to The Damned Don't Cry would be misleading as well, as obviously The Damned Don't Cry (2022 film) is also a film. I have edited the main reasoning for clarity. Cavarrone 05:46, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I understood you the first time. If the 1950 film is the primary topic then pointing this redirect there is not misleading in the slightest, because it would take people looking for that primary topic to the content they are looking for and there is already a hatnote to the 2022 film. If there isn't a primary topic then The Damned Don't Cry should be a disambiguation page with the nominated title being a redirect to it as a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} and the article about the earlier film moved to The Damned Don't Cry (1950 film). In neither circumstance is deletion necessary or beneficial. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not keep, do not delete per everyone. Steel1943 (talk) 05:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 19:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Trump Kennedy Center → John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There's no such thing as the Trump Kennedy Center and given the minimal number of hits, readers don't think there is either. Suggest deletion. Wehwalt (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I think it's in reference to Lin-Manuel Miranda. He's quoted saying this in the NYT in reference to Trump's takeover as chairman. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 13:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Does that make it a worthwhile redirect? Pageviews are next to nothing. Wehwalt (talk) 13:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree with your reasoning (see below), just put this here to help investigate the redirect's original rationale. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 19:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Redirect seems to be a stretch here. It is based on a single trivial mention. This name is not official and does not appear to be widely used. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, at least for now. This is a nickname for the target that plausibly might catch on, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and unless and until it does gain currency it's not a good redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unoffical name based on a single comment. Although fleetingly mentioned in RS, this is not a widely used phrase at this point in time. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 19:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation if suitable reliable sources are found for this name. ^Complex/_Rational 19:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Peter James Jonathan Joseph Field Wicks → Peter Wicks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not a plausible search term, no meaningful page history, no reason to retain CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 11:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this is a perfectly harmless {{R from full name}}. Deletion would bring no benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless it is verified that this is actually his full name and has been used as such in acceptable sources. My search only returned Wikipedia[1], so this may be made up or only available in primary sources (birth certificate and the like), in which case we shouldn't use it. See WP:BLPPRIVACY. Fram (talk) 13:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I can't find any sources to show this is the true full name of the celebrity either. Other people have edited in the past to add the unproven names without acceptable sources. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:38, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This is now a double redirect: Peter J. J. J. F. Wicks -> Peter Wicks -> Pete Wicks CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 13:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a disruptive editor (now blocked) moved the article to this title under discussion, and it was promptly reverted. Jay 💬 14:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was article created. Jay 💬 15:20, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Peyton Parrish → List of Mayhem Festival lineups by year  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Has previously been RFD'd at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Peyton Parrish per D10, while pointing to a completely separate article (Adam Gontier#Other appearances). There's not any real content here, either. Probably still delete per D10 and WP:XY. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:12, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Six articles mention Parrish (List of Mayhem Festival lineups by year, Adam Gontier, Neil Sanderson production and songwriting discography, Saliva discography, Tommy Vext and Barrett's Privateers); none contain any substantial information about him. No reason to choose any of these as a target above the others – a search result showing them all will be more useful than any of them as a redirect target. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Create article - Parrish has been featured in numerous reliable sources. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I support this, D10 is intended to encourage article creation. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 20:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  If Parrish is notable, replacing the redirect with Jax's draft seems the obvious solution. I will say that it's not obvious to me from the sources currently in the draft that he is: Billboard is a reliable source but it's not clear to me that this article is in-depth coverage; I've never heard of Ghost Cult Magazine but this article reads like a promotional press release from Parrish rather than an independent article, and I don't see how any of the other cited sources count towards notability (albeit I do not have access to the Utica Observer Dispatch article). Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 04:00, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Dot-tech → .tech  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Incorrectly nominated for PROD by Agowa (talk · contribs) with rationale: .tech exists for no other TLD does a page with the "Dot-*" exist. I'm not convinced, but I'm doing this anyway as a procedural process. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:43, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment dot-biz, dot-coop, dot-info, dot-museum, dot-name, dot-pro and dot-shop all exist as redirects to articles about the domain name. dot-com and dot-Com both exist, but they target the Dotcom dab page and Dotcom bubble article respectively (they should probably point to the same place, but I'm not awake enough to look into it further right now). Thryduulf (talk) 04:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having looked into it, I've retargetted Dot-Com to point at the Dotcom disambiguation page to match Dot-com, Dot.com and Dot.Com. Anyone should feel free to start a separate discussion if they disagree. Thryduulf (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I went through a bunch of TLDs (mostly geoTLD though) and I didn't look at the 7 you mentioned. Should these redirects then be created for all others as well? Agowa (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a plausible, unambiguous search term for the target that matches other similar redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, plausible to infer that such a redirect would exist from the other redirects pointed out and unambiguous. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 17:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - plausible, unambiguous. BugGhost 🦗👻 10:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget DreamWorks Madagascar to Madagascar (franchise). Jay 💬 03:38, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• DreamWorks Madagascar → Madagascar (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Madagascar (DreamWorks) → Madagascar (franchise)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

First of all, this is NOT a nomination to delete this redirect: it is a plausible search term and needs to be kept. This is instead on where it should be targeted. Madagascar (DreamWorks) links to the franchise article so that is my idea on where to retarget, but this is something that I would like insight into. Anyone have their opinions? RanDom 404 (talk) 00:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I've added Madagascar (franchise) to this discussion, because both redirects should point to the same target, whatever that is. DreamWorks Madagascar 3: The Video Game also exists as a redirect to Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted#Video games but that is unambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Perhaps dabify? Seeing as the video game and the franchise were both developed by DreamWorks. Plant🌱man (talk) 02:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The video game is technically part of the franchise, though. I think redirecting to Madagascar (franchise) would be best ApexParagon (talk) 03:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah, you're right. Not the first mistake I've made. Plant🌱man (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Not gonna lie, my brain is completely fried at the moment. I need to step away from this for a bit... Plant🌱man (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget DreamWorks Madagascar to Madagascar (franchise) I agree that this could plausibly refer to either the video games or the films. Targeting the main article seems like the best option here. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).