I've listed this article for peer review for a GA application.

Thanks, KarsVegas36 (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KarsVegas36: Hello, and thank you for your interest in improving this article! The good article criteria is available at this link. There are a few things that would need to be addressed before this could pass a good article review. You are not currently one of the top contributors of the article, which would be considered a "drive-by nomination" and would quickly fail the assessment. However, you could become a major contributor if you can work out some of these problems:

• Per Wikipedia:Verifiability, everything in the article must be supported by a reliable source. There are many paragraphs that fail to cite a source. For example, the first paragraph under the "Foundation and early history" section has no citation at all. If you want to improve this article, your first priority is to make sure all of those paragraphs have reliable sources to back the information up.
• Another problem is that many of the sources in the article are unreliable. There are citations to self-published sources such as Twitter/X, and Flickr, and other unreliable sources such as Angelfire, and Anadolu Agency. For this article to be improved, these citations will have to be removed and replaced by more reliable ones.
• The article has a promotional tone throughout it. For example, take a look at this sentence in the lead: Also, in March 2008, Fenerbahçe's record application was accepted by Guinness World Records, which envisages Fenerbahçe to have the highest number of medal and trophy achievements on the planet with its 9 departments entirely, a total of 1134 cups and medals. This sentence is not neutrally worded, which is extremely important on Wikipedia. Take a look at WP:PEACOCK. There are also other terms that are also not acceptable, such as unparalleled, passionate, and appreciated at the highest level.

Writing my first good article was one of the most rewarding things I could have done on Wikipedia, and it taught me how to write and reference better. But I couldn't have done it when I first started out editing, because there were too many technical details I hadn't learned about until after I gained a lot of experience. My advice to you, if you really want to turn this into a good article, is to wait for now. Go and get more experience doing some other things around Wikipedia to gain vital knowledge. Then you can apply that knowledge into improving the article, first and foremost by addressing the problems above. Have fun on your editing journey, and let me know on my talk page if you have any further questions. ‍Relativity ⚡️ 22:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]