The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 12:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gekritzl/Deletion gestapo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:POLEMIC by a now indef'ed account. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep although you may disagree with this and it may be inflammatory, it is a valid point of view expressed in an essay. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOTWEBHOST. This is not WP policy, so no need to forever host this stale personal editorial. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete I think it's meant to be an article draft and not an essay. But it's written in too inflammatory a way to every become a viable article. Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia already exists. Brustopher (talk) 23:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it's expressly stated in the second line that it's an article, thus a stale draft rather than an essay. Given the user is blocked, I see no reason to keep (unless someone else wants to take it over in their userspace and rewrite it).--kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.