The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Final Cut - Deep Into the Cut (CD issue).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soul Crusher ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

NFCC#8 is false for this secondary image of an alternate cover design: The claim is wrong that "The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work." Binksternet (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 19:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:C-Tec - Cut (2018 digital issue).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soul Crusher ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

NFCC#8 is wrong because this is a secondary image, not the primary image associated with the work. This secondary image is not discussed in the article prose, and it is not shown to be important to the topic. Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Electro Assassin - The Divine Invasion (Fifth Colvmn).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soul Crusher ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

NFCC#8 is wrong because this is a secondary image, not the primary image associated with the work. This secondary image is not discussed in the article prose, and it is not shown to be important to the topic. Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 23:44, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Rain - Rebellion Is Over (alternate cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soul Crusher ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

NFCC#8 is wrong because this is a secondary image, not the primary image associated with the work. This secondary image is not discussed in the article prose, and it is not shown to be important to the topic. Binksternet (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep! This one is VERY clearly not copyrightable. It's a square and simple text. It should be listed as PD simple. Buffs (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Adjusted tags accordingly Buffs (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Concern seems to have been addressed. ✗plicit 03:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Abuela Frontera dance video.ogv (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pollosito ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Too large to claim WP:Fair use. In fact, I think this is the full video. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. I think just the almost-first 20 or 25 seconds are useful. However, I cannot cut it down, specially when I will be unavailable until between March 14 and 17. What can we do then? Santi (talk) 04:15, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone with the right tool needs to reduce it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checking it once more, I think the useful part lasts from 0:06 to 0:40, but it can be cropped more if still violates the non-free use rationale. Santi (talk) 04:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This version should be deleted, copyright holders are not interested in waiting for a user's availability. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: With the few minutes I have with Internet outside, I checked how was it going, and I met this. I never asked for waiting for me, I was asking someone to crop that video to the necessary part, they can base it on the El Sol de México's clip duration. I was asking for cropping it while I am not available, as there Is not a policy that demands the file author to do it. Thanks. Santi (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch; @Traumnovelle: I already uploaded a shortened version of the og file, and it cost me a lot of time to do it. Santi (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pollosito, for future reference, https://videocuttool.wmcloud.org/ can trim videos and export them back to your device. Most of the online video editors are a royal pain to use. JayCubby 04:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.