The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no Delete arguments presented (non-admin closure) DonaldD23 talk to me 01:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Young Toscanini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES, WP:NFO and WP:SIGCOV. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a review from Radio Times. Needs one more suitable and reliable review in order to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep as a silly nomination, borderline disruptive. Altough it's a little known film, you need a lot of silliness to figure that a film by Franco Zeffirelli starring Elizabeth Taylor is non-notable. I've added two reviews, from La Repubblica and The Guardian. And the reviews were not even that necessary, as in Google Books there's plenty of sigcov, eg. a whole chapter in Harvey Sachs' book Reflections on Toscanini (as well as hints of further reviews, eg. from The Hollywood Reporter and Newsweek, although snippets do not really help). Not the first time the same nominator wastes the community's time to assess obviously notable films for which a less lazy WP:BEFORE or even a bit of common sense would have sufficed. Cavarrone 22:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (just because this is still here after day one; should be speedy) Cavarrone helped it meet WP:GNG and we're not removing an article about a known Liz Taylor movie. Nate • (chatter) 22:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Cavarrone First off, thank you for finding those sources. They’re persuasive enough for me to withdraw the nomination. Second, please see WP:NOPA. In my defense, I nominate in good faith. I’m trying to help the project, not hurt it. The Film Creator (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The Film Creator Sure, but also WP:competence is required. How many dozens noms have you withdraw in a few hours because the movies were obviously notable and the WP:BEFORE was defective? Maybe you could ask yourself a few questions. Sorry to sound harsh, but this is becoming disruptive, and nominating a Franco Zeffirelli-Elizabeth Taylor film is just a joke. Cavarrone 22:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.