The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Baldwin Brothers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

band of questionable notability WuhWuzDat 15:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• keep allmusic.com entry [1], mirrored on mtv.com, article in regional paper [2]. Album produced by notable producer (Trumfio), with notable guest artist collobaration. This info was gleaned through a relatively quick search.Vulture19 (talk) 18:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Following WP:BEFORE may well have thrown up these which would make the band's notability not at all questionable: Allmusic bio, mixmatters article, CMJ New Music Monthly, Daily Eastern News, PopMatters (see #3), Allmusic review, Allmusic review.--Michig (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Per Michig. Joe Chill (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources found. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 00:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seem notable.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - I'm not sure they meet any factor for WP:BAND, but based on sources found and their songs used in video games, I'd let it slide. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per Michig. Agree about wp:before. Suggest that the nom agrees to it being kept, so we don't have more editors wasting time on this.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.