The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Animaniacs characters. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Skullhead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an extremely minor segment of a cartoon that has no real relevance outside of the brief description in List of Animaniacs characters. The current sources are trivial mentions of the character that do not provide actual significant coverage to fit WP:N. They are each one sentence mentions being given too much weight, and there is no actual in-depth discussion of the character to establish actual notability. TTN (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Animaniacs characters. Very minor character in the show, with little impact on other cartoons or the real world. Definitely not like Pinky and the Brain or the Warners. ThemFromSpace 17:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - A mention in the LA Times [1] and secondary sources such as IGN [2] show notability to me. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Both of those sources are one line passing mentions. How is that significant coverage? ThemFromSpace 01:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per Themfromspace. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.