The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saros (astronomy). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar Saros 163 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too early：The most recent lunar eclipse of the cycle will not be visible until 300 years later, so there is no need to create a page that points to the solar saros now. Ｑ₂₈ (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a copy of data from a single source with no other evidence of notability. All of the entries are after the year 2370. Praemonitus (talk) 14:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Saros (astronomy). Definitely WP:TOOSOON. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 18:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.