The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of villages in Panchkula district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looking through this "list", almost all of it is redlinked. None of it is sourced. Of the blue links, I have found, so far, exactly one that links to a village in Panchukla district (Pinjore). There is no reason to believe that this list is an actual, accurate list of Panchkula district villages. Even if it were, actually getting it to the point where it contained no information instead of innaccurate information (as it does now) would be far more work than starting over with what we know for sure is an accurate list. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment—It should be quite possible to compare the list to the Indian census,[1] then cleanup accordingly.—RJH (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Although not as blindingly bad as a similar article by the same creator currently up for AFD, I'm no more convinced about the accuracy of this content. If we are to have an article at this title, it will need to be rebuilt entirely from a reliable source. Trying to use this material as a roadmap is actually worse than having nothing at all. Serpent's Choice (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Yes, this, in fact, is my point. Re:RJH's point, if someone wants to recreate this article based on the government census data, I think that's a great idea. I think that doing that from scratch will be significantly easier than somehow trying to integrate it with this article. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I think that it needs to be started from scratch, if at all. There are far too many issues regarding veracity. - Sitush (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.