The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Masjid Salfia Maitra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NRELORG/the GNG. The sources cited in the article only mention the mosque in passing (if at all), and a WP:BEFORE search found no significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. The article was dePRODded without explanation by an IP, but the notability issues remain. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Islam, and India. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• This is official article of Jamia Masjid Salfia Maitra . so please don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4054:2190:E66F:7BD8:B4F0:96E6:18C9 (talk) 05:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Wikipedia article. Not some "official article" by any stretch. -The Gnome (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails Wikipedia:GNG and I do not see any reliable sources at all. Chip3004 (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While I sympathize with those seeking recognition of local landmarks, not everything can attain notability, and this does not. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Subject fails WP:GNG. The relevant church-notability guideline should be perhaps revisited. -The Gnome (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Is there such a guideline that claims that this is notable? I can find nothing in English to indicate a pass of the WP:GNG, the only relevant guideline that I know of, so, unless someone with a knowledge of Urdu or another relevant language can help, the passing mentions that this has would indicate a redirect to Maitra, Ramban, where it is mentioned. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per GNG, WP:SNOW, and my standards. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, No reliable sources , fails wp:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.