The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. John254 01:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Watts (Australian footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. --VS ^talk 22:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. A Google news search returns hundreds of results, and he is notable for being the No. 1 draft pick. There are US college athlete articles, for players at amateur level, and this would serve as a double standard. Harro5 23:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- This person does not meet WP:ATHLETE (both the previous version and the current decrappified version of the guideline), but that doesn't matter in this case. If an athlete passes the stronger and more general WP:BIO through extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources, then this trumps specific cases of it like WP:ATHLETE. Jack Watts has plenty of the necessary coverage. Reyk _YO! 01:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - #1 AFL Draft pick is notable before he plays a game at the AFL level, due to extensive news (i.e. WP:RS) interest in the draft. Some of the other nominated Draft picks might be deletable but the #1 pick is not. Peter Ballard (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - article is adequately sourced to meet the guidelines of WP:BIO, regardless of his current inability to pass the WP:ATHLETE sub-guideline. Mlaffs (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.