Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrity (Britney Spears album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. No source has named it "Integrity". Pure crystal-ballism. – Sasquatch t|c 17:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Integrity (Britney Spears album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This is just a copy and paste of Britney Spears' fifth studio album. There are all sorts of rumours about this album, and we've been quite strict here on the English Wikipedia about keeping them out. There have been several rumoured names, none of which have been backed up with sources, and I and other editors have removed such unsourced rubbish from the article many times.

(Other language Wikipedias, such as the Galician Wikipedia and the Turkish Wikipedia, have not been as diligent. I've just removed several bogus names from gl:Britney Spears, tr:Britney Spears, fi:Britney Spears, and pap:Britney Spears.)

The simple truth is that Spears has not given this album a name, yet. She is currently running a competition to allow the fans to pick a name. I suspect, given that I've already had to edit out unsourced claims that this title won, that the creation of this article is an attempt to stack that poll. After all, news organizations are already citing Britney Spears' fifth studio album as their sources for information on what is happening. (See this badly researched article by Angela Russell published by Associated Content, Inc., for example.)

When Spears picks a name, as a result of the competition or otherwise, we can rename Britney Spears' fifth studio album to whatever name it turns out to be. But that time has not arrived yet. There is and will be no requirement for this copy and paste duplicate at this title. Nor is or will there be there a requirement for a redirect. Uncle G 16:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.