Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingibjörg Egilsdóttir
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ingibjörg Egilsdóttir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, just slightly know from WP:ONEEVENT The Banner talk 11:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I have fixed the issues that made the article not fit within GNG and ONEEVENT. This article is no longer eligible for deletion.--Snaevar (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- It still is as those non-notable events are not adding anything to her notability. The Banner talk 20:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree fully. Under WP:oneevent stands: "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." Miss World is an worldwide highly significant event. That isn't just my opinion, but it is also regarded as such by Wikiproject Beauty Pageants.
- So basically you are basing your delete request on a personal opinion that it is falsely not a significant event. Honestly I also expect more from an deletion nominator than one-liners. I am not going to explain this in depth if you won't do the same.--Snaevar (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- In fact, your opinion is also just your personal opinion. But she has only won a preliminary round for Miss Universe 2009 amd did not reach of the top places there. So she had not "a highly significant role" there. The Banner talk 22:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the new source that proves that she did not even win the preliminary competition but ended as nr. 2. The Banner talk 21:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- So basically you are basing your delete request on a personal opinion that it is falsely not a significant event. Honestly I also expect more from an deletion nominator than one-liners. I am not going to explain this in depth if you won't do the same.--Snaevar (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - did not win any pageant, coverage is not sufficient to pass GNG Kraxler (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Kraxler. Searches returned nothing to show this person meets the notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 13:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Not particularly notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.