The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw^talk 02:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Five major beauty pageants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced collection of content already covered in other articles, including Big Four international beauty pageants. It's superfluous and a violation of WP:NOR to create an article including a fifth pageant, and appears to have a promotional intent. JNW (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete also List of major beauty pageant winners by year and List of major beauty pageant winners by country, more new articles with the same rationale of creating a 'big five'. JNW (talk) 13:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete concurring fully with the reasoning of the nominator and JNW. Safiel (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This page should not be deleted because it does not copy any information from other pages rather it gives additional information that other pages or article lack. This page summarizes the five pageants' result through tables and it gives history about the said pageants that other pages might have failed to give. This page is an all in one information, which I believe people will have a convenience in looking for the tallies. This page should not be deleted rather this should be improved. Thank you and I appreciate further improvements. I believe this page will soon be the most visited page in wikipedia in terms on pageant results Markimatix (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is a fork of List of major beauty pageant winners by country, which should also be deleted for the same reasons mentioned by the nominator. I cannot find any reliable source that supports the claim that Miss Supranational is a pageant at the same level as the big four. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three for reasons given by nominator and others. Sideways713 (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article content is already covered in other article, there is no need for content fork, this article is not notable by its own. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 18:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - duplicated content entirely unsourced Flat Out let's discuss it 07:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This page is qualified to be retained since Supranational is now considered a major beauty pageant. It even surpasses Miss International when it comes to number of entrants. Miss International 2010 holds the record of 70 entrants only the most number ever since it started and Miss Earth 2013 has its record of 88 entrants while in Miss Supranational 2013 already has 89. Miss Supranational surpasses Miss International and Miss Earth when it comes to number of entrants — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.58.210 (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. The number of "entrants" to a pageant is irrelevant; what is required is evidence that independent reliable sources consider there to be "five major beauty pageants". That evidence is nonexistent. bd2412 T 16:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.