The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Richardson (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to have played in a competitive fixture for a fully professional team yet. Uhooep (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Uhooep (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England. Shellwood (talk) 13:45, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete—Almost comes across as a joke article. At the very best WP:TOOSOON. Anwegmann (talk) 04:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Would the Sunderland Echo sources count as WP:LOCAL? If not, then I will begrudgingly vote to keep, even though the article is terrible. Anwegmann (talk) 04:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sunderland Echo is obviously a local source, but as long as it's not user-generated, that would be fine. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I meant "LOCAL" in the sense that it'd have any connection to the club itself. Also, user-generated is not the only determining factor in a source's viability. Anwegmann (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep probably just enough decent coverage with Sunderland Echo/Chronicle sources to show notability. GiantSnowman 16:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep—If the Sunderland Echo is a sufficient source, I think this falls neatly within the bounds of WP:TOOSOON. Anwegmann (talk) 21:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Promise of English football with enough coverage for WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per above. Young player with ongoing pro career and sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.