Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
Wikalevi!
I've noticed some of your edits and I want to say hello!
Based on your edits, you may be on the younger side. Here are some important rules all editors under 18 should follow:
Never share your name, age, school, family, friends, or location	Talk to a trusted adult about safety	Ask to hide personal information you've shared here
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Exploring Wikipedia	Editing articles
Important rules of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	Get help!
Here are some of the important rules you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Others are here to help	Be kind and polite
Be aware of copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse to ask other people questions about editing Wikipedia.
Finally, remember to never share information about yourself.
If you have any questions, click this link to ask a question and someone will come to help you soon.

Cheers, JensonSL (SilverLocust) 10:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, new users are not allowed to edit or discuss the Israel–Palestine conflict. Here's some more info about that below. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 10:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 10:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh k. Wikalevi (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Not ready yet to edit here, competence issues.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 13:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry to have to do this and hope very much you will come back in a rew years and ask for an unblock. I'm sure in time your skills will increase enough to be a good editor. Doug Weller talk 13:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A few years? you have got to be kidding me. unblock me pleaasee! i have great edit skills. >:( Wikalevi (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK ME PLEASE. OR I WILL VANISH FROM WIKIPEDIA. Wikalevi (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fill in the unblock request as it says. If you do, other Admins will see it. If you don't, they won't. You are of course allowed to vanish from Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 08:44, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me. i amm new on the block and would like to edit more on wikipedia. Wikalevi (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yay i am unblocked! :) Wikalevi (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sory i meam ot unblocked. vry unappy Wikalevi (talk) 06:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have made another acount user name is penacoladoia Wikalevi (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikalevi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i want to be unblocked because doug weller has made a ridiculous block all because of me not being ready to edit. Another reason is i did a contentious topic. But the thing is, i am new. how am i ment to know what a contentious topic is?

Decline reason:

While I'm here, I'm declining your appeal, because it, or for that matter anything else I've seen here, does not convince me that unblocking you at this time would benefit the project. If you wish to make further appeals, in the fullness of time, please read and understand WP:GAB and WP:CIR, as well as WP:CTOP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikalevi (talk) 06:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with how to ban/block people.

}} Wikalevi (talk) 06:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw someone with a rude username Wikalevi (talk) 06:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You needn't worry about blocking anyone, a) because you're not an admin, and b) you're blocked yourself.

Please don't edit this page unnecessarily. As a blocked user, you're only allowed to appeal or discuss your block here. Unnecessary edits may get you blocked from editing this page as well. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok. although i want to block p___s, i won't. Wikalevi (talk) 07:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not usually allow you to use multiple accounts, and we specifically disallow using a new account to circumvent a block, as you have done. The relevant policy is at WP:SOCK; please read it. I appreciate that you are enthusiastic about Wikipedia, but you need to show that you can follow our rules. If you would like to edit here again, please take a bit of a break, and file an unblock request when you come back explaining what you would do differently. If you make more new accounts they will be found and blocked, so don't do that. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. although i don't neesd info i didn't use my other accound for what u said. i used it to see how many edit reviews i had got.u Wikalevi (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is an edit review? And you haven't edited any articles. Doug Weller talk 07:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i would think you ought to look at ur home page. i hve edited 100 times. go to impact on your home page to see.and also click on my name.here : Wikalevi (talk) and go to my contributions.Wikalevi (talk) Wikalevi (talk) 06:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, of course you have. You changed the initials of a football club incorrectly, you changed using a standard template {{cvt|120|km} to 120km (75 miles) which you shouldn't have done.

Oh, and your first edit was "The use of ipads date back to the 1940s. Ipas were very cheap baack then.".

But my question is what is an edit review? Doug Weller talk 08:44, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

imo, i answered ur question. but i will answer it again:

A edit review is where you see how many people hve viewed ur edits. and btw, i didn't mean to edit that first. Wikalevi (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And how do you find that out? Doug Weller talk 11:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, you go to ur home page. and then click on ' my impact' then,scroll down on that and you'll see a title called: most viewed edits. Wikalevi (talk) 05:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I needed some assistance in figuring out what you refer to, but this is a new feature rolled out for new users, which shows how many people have read the pages you have edited after you edited them. It does not indicate anything about whether those edits were good, and it is completely irrelevant to your misuse of multiple accounts. I will repeat, for emphasis: you may not use multiple accounts on Wikipedia in the way that you were doing. If you wish to return to editing you will need to file an unblock request showing that you understood what problems you caused and convincing us that you will avoid them. Anything else is a waste of the community's time. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what I have done CLEARLY so can you unblock me? Wikalevi (talk) 07:57, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]