Hello, Theshehv, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Theshehv/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Air on White (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Theshehv/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Air on White (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page RSB Bello-Fadile, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed. Thank you for pointing out the error. Theshehv (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abubakar Shehu Idris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abubakar Shehu Idris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ednabrenze (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stone Tech Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Tech Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Patre23 (talk) 05:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Stone Tech Square requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Tech Square. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kaduna Capital School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As should be evident from the above, you have been creating too many inappropriate articles. The creation of inappropriate articles is disruptive and wasteful of other editors' time. Before you attempt to create another article, please read our policies on neutrality, notability, and reliability of sources. Also, please consider using the draft and articles for creation process while you are still inexperienced. Should you once more create an inappropriate article, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article that I created is a renowned old government school in Kaduna founded by Sir Ahmadu Bello in 1957, I think you should check and see its notability whether it should stay in Wikipedia or not. Theshehv (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That may or may not be, but you still would not be able to write about it in a promotional tone. It does, now that I look at it, appear that you used a chatbot to write at least parts of it. Chatbots do not write appropriate material for articles; please ensure that you do not use them for that. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theshehv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to express my sincere apologies for any actions or behavior that may have led to my block on Wikipedia. I understand and respect the community guidelines and recognize the importance of maintaining a collaborative, respectful, and constructive environment. If I inadvertently violated any policies or caused any disruption, it was never my intention. I have reflected on my actions and am committed to contributing positively to the community moving forward. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to return and demonstrate my willingness to engage in good faith editing. Please consider lifting the block, and I will do my best to ensure that I adhere to Wikipedia’s standards and work constructively with fellow contributors. Also if you check my history, you will see that i created some pages with care and concern to the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute again. Theshehv (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests like this are abusive and will never lead to your unblock. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hi @Theshehv:, this appeal looks a lot like it was written by AI - you've been blocked so it's important that you write your own appeal, not the AI.

Another issue with using AI is that it's not addressed any of the concerns raised. Please read WP:Guide to appealing blocks to see how you should write an appeal that's likely to be accepted.

You need to explain what you did that led to your block, show that you understand why it was a problem, and prove that you understand how to avoid doing the same thing again in future. Without that, your appeal is probably going to be declined.

If you are using AI to write your articles for you, the programming tends to write in a promotional and unencyclopaedic way - that's not appropriate for Wikipedia. You either need to write the articles yourself or learn how to identify and remove/correct promotional language before you consider creating any more articles (or even editing in general).

Also, can you confirm your relationship to the subject(s) of your articles? I note this question has been asked by other editors, so it'd be helpful for you to go over it here. Blue Sonnet (talk) 17:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAD ICT Hub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAD ICT Hub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theshehv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedian Community, I wrote some articles about some prominent places in Kaduna which are as follows: Stone Tech Square, Kaduna Capital School and KAD ICT Hub, which lead to my suspension, I really acknowledged that I made them look too much in an advertorial way which I will make sure to improve that from here forward. So I am appealing to the community to kindly unblock so I can continue contributing my quota to this community because I love making improvements and contributions to a community like this. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Upon further investigation, I have determined that you are being dishonest here and that you do have a connection Stone Tech Square. This is based on information sent to the VRT that I am not allowed to specifically disclose(other VRT volunteers, check the edit history for the ticket number). Theshehv, there is no pathway forward until you are honest about your connection to at least two subjects you have edited about. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's no "quota" here. Many, many users are successful editors without creating a single article. That's not the only, or even best, way to contribute. What is your connection to the subjects of your edits? 331dot (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No connection, also I want to make note, if you check my account history, you will see that I made some edits and contributed on some articles. I just happened to stumble upon these places and feel like they supposed to have a wikipedia page because they are recognized entities in the state. Theshehv (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theshehv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, In response to the connection you want me to disclose, I was a student at Kaduna Capital School around 2011. I am also a staff at Stone Tech Square. I'm sorry for not disclosing the staff issue, because it was not public at this moment. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Sorry, "sorry" is not good enough. You've created multiple articles in which you have a clear conflict of interest, some of them multiple times, despite several warnings. This has taken up a lot of community time to clean up and discuss at AfD, as well as much administrator time to delete, block, review your unblock requests, not to mention finally tease out of you the admission that you do, in fact, have undisclosed COI/PAID issues. The block was certainly warranted, and I see no benefit to the project in unblocking you. I'm declining your appeal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review your request, but I can say that your connection is stronger than just a staff member, even if you are one as well- though perhaps that's enough to tell us. The reviewing admin will want to know why you attempted to mislead us here by saying "no connection". Being a student at the school is not necessarily an issue that prevents you from editing about it, though you will need to resolve your promotional tone issues. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for me saying no connection is because I am yet to be confirmed as a full staff, and also for the promotional tone, I will work on that. Theshehv (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @Theshehv So to clarify, you said that you weren't connected to the subject of your edits because it wasn't "official yet"? But you nevertheless still had a financial/professional interest in them at the time you wrote that?

331dot also has concerns that you've got a stronger connection than just being a member of staff, are you able to provide any clarification on that?

These are more in-depth questions than I'd usually ask, but we're starting off in a position of eroded trust so it'll take more effort for you to make your way out of that position, I'm afraid. Blue Sonnet (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

True, I only had professional interest but not financial interest at the time I wrote the article.

In response to 331dot, the position that I am given is cofounding the company, and yet to be finalised.

Thank you. Theshehv (talk) 23:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, but your hair splitting and dishonesty here leads me to oppose unblocking you; but it won't be up to me. 331dot (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]