Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. Bennett Johnston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McClure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malcolm Wallop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McClure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperWIKI @KingEdinburgh @Neovu79

Tonight, I met a Colonel in the Georgia Army National Guard who served as an Executive Officer to Major General Joseph Jarrard (I met him another time two years ago and I think I mentioned it then too).

He told me that Jarrard's nomination to be Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau has been sent to The White House but The White House has yet to take action and send it to the Senate. I asked if Jarrard would go straight from 2-star to 4-star and the Colonel said they'd make him a 3-star for a day or two as a formality.

• • Side note: He also mentioned LTG Carden was a pain to work for but he was likely chosen for elevation because he "gets things done".

EPMen (talk) 04:03, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh. Thanks for the info! SuperWIKI (talk) 04:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperWIKI - Re: Army IG - Dooghan is not considered an Acting Army IG for the record, it was a short-term gapfill. He is not considered one of the actual IGs, and does not belong on the list of IGs. CPLgrumpy (talk) 16:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperWIKI @KingEdinburgh@Neovu79@Garuda28@Morinao

The Trump administration is considering giving up America's role as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe. (per https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-admin-considers-giving-nato-command-exclusively-american-eisenho-rcna196503)

Apparently they're also considering merging AFRICOM with EUCOM, and SOUTHCOM with NORTHCOM. (per https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/live-blog/trump-france-emmanuel-macron-white-house-ukraine-tariffs-live-updates-rcna193386/rcrd73653?canonicalCard=true and https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/live-blog/live-updates-trump-cabinet-meeting-elon-musk-doge-rcna193745/rcrd73775?canonicalCard=true).

These would be major seismic changes. Thoughts? EPMen (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More work for me 😭 SuperWIKI (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In all seriousness, the command mergers are so-so for me, but I take issue with the U.S. giving up the position of SACEUR. SuperWIKI (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperWIKI Well apparently Trump's fellow Republicans are concerned too. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5204366-gop-chairmen-rogers-wicker-trump-nato-command/ EPMen (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SuperWIKI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grant and his Generals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]