A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your hard work improving plant articles! I enjoy seeing them at DYK, especially today's grand slam multi-hook. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Premeditated Chaos: Thank you! I've gotten a mixed reception to this hook (I should have anticipated that!) but I am extremely glad you enjoyed reading it as much as I enjoyed creating it! ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

removed
  • Jarry1250
  • Lethe

CheckUser changes

removed
  • AmandaNP
  • Drmies

Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate NO OWN and I DON'T LIKE because you have a hang-up against the accurate and more precise and more clear term "Roman Catholic"

I looked at your user page and I see what the problem is. You're "Catholic". And you flaunt it and display it big time. It's a THING with you obviously. So you're gonna have some kind of bias it seems unnecessarily.

Against the term “Roman Catholic”, on many occasions. For some oddball reason, and unnecessarily, because the term Roman Catholic is Roman Catholic’s OWN OFFICIAL WORDING ORIGINALLY.

Church buildings that have the phrase right on the building. Like "Saint Joseph's Roman Catholic Church" and "Most Precious Blood Roman Catholic Church". Saying it right there. Some of many examples. But I’ve noticed that many Catholics lately don’t like to use the phrase Roman Catholic for whatever reason. (Though some of them use the phrase "Roman Catholic" for themselves no problem. Depends. But some avoid that phrase sometimes.) Too bad. The word “Catholic” is not just Roman Catholic.

Eastern Orthodox also use the term “catholic” but obviously not in a Roman Catholic sense. The Anglican Church has used the term catholic for itself sometimes, but obviously not in a Roman Catholic sense. Even the Lutheran Church uses the term catholic for itself sometimes in a sense, but obviously not in a Roman Catholic sense.

King Henry the 8th didn't just leave the Catholic church, but he left more specifically the ROMAN Catholic Church. And it is arguably necessary to make that more clear. Why not?? And even if you don't think it's necessary, that's just your opinion. You don't own the article.

Do not bring in your biases and hang-ups to a Wikipedia page, acting as if it's your blog. Remember NO OWN and I don't like. You violate that all the time when you do this. Revert again. Be reverted again. Remember. You started this edit war. Seriously. Not I. And regardless of what some fact-denying or biased admins may or may not say, facts are facts, and you're in violation of WP policy and drift in this matter. Regards 2603:7000:A900:45DF:710D:59C:8DBB:39DC (talk) 09:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that much of this doesn't read comprehensibly. That said, I would direct you to Catholic Church and Roman Catholic (term) for a bit of insight. ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your response was not an argument. No specifics, substance, or actually addressing of anything. It was just a juvenile HORN TOOT. And a DODGE. I've read all of that. And I know this situation. And you just evaded the facts and the points that the term "Catholic" is NOT JUST Roman Catholic. The term "Roman Catholic" is more specific and more clear, especially in context. Etc. King Henry the 8th did not just leave quote the "Catholic" church. But the Roman papal Catholic Church more specifically. And that should be arguably made a bit more clear in context. You violated NO OWN. And I DON'T preh. Did you comend that? 2603:7000:A900:45DF:710D:59C:8DBB:39DC (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How did I violate WP:OWN? I reverted your addition of an edit that adds an unclear term. Having written about a dozen articles on the English Reformation and Anglicanism, I am familiar with the considerations regarding using Roman Catholic. In this context, there is no pressing interest to use Roman Catholic, as Anglo-Catholic self-disambiguates. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've reblocked the IP range for continued disruption. This is far from the first time they've caused this same disruption and been blocked for it.-- Ponyobons mots 20:27, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the assist, Ponyo. I hope they learn OWN doesn't mean what they think it means. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge University Amateur Dramatic Club

I'm sure you Googled this, but did you look into Google books? I think this might be notable. Bearian (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of sources are either minutes of Cambridge student organizations or fail to provide any SIGCOV. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Voices of Morebath

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Voices of Morebath you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aquilegia micrantha var. mancosana

On 13 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aquilegia micrantha var. mancosana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a variety of the Mancos columbine was thought to be extinct but was found in its native cave in 2008? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aquilegia micrantha var. mancosana. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aquilegia micrantha var. mancosana), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aquilegia micrantha

On 13 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aquilegia micrantha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a variety of the Mancos columbine was thought to be extinct but was found in its native cave in 2008? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aquilegia micrantha var. mancosana. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aquilegia micrantha), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pbritti
No tags for this post.