Archives

Index Archive 0 Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freya Holmér and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pauliesnug! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freya Holmér and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Freya Holmér. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much! pauliesnug ^{(message / contribs)} 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paulinesnug.

can you please confirm that you actually retrieved the executive orders for the second Trump administration in 2025 from the National Archives? their website states that they stopped hosting executive orders in 2017. Perhaps you are referring to the Federal Register, operated by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration? however they have not yet published any of the orders you have listed.

thank you. Geordannik (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, currently the records are from https://www.whitehouse.gov/, and they will be updated with EO publications from the Federal Record once they are published. pauliesnug ^{(message / contribs)} 13:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paulie! ✨

My name is Sarai Sanchez, and I'm a member of the Product Design team at the Wikimedia Foundation. We're conducting a round of online interviews to gather feedback from new Toolforge users on the latest features we're working on. We believe that you recently created a Toolforge account, and that makes you a great candidate for the exploration. Would you be interested in taking part? If so, please fill out this short survey. Participants will receive a thank-you gift as a token of our appreciation.

Thank you for your time and consideration! SSanchez-WMF (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]