Dont mind. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Every statement needs to be supported by a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naveen Bethiganti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naveen Bethiganti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbrks (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbrks (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seshu KMR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seshu KMR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naveen Bethiganti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naveen Bethiganti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhishek Agarwal Arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Agarwal Arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Agarwal Arts, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. @@@XyX _talk 11:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paradoxodarap! Your additions to Abhishek Agarwal Arts have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• • That was very insightful, Ill be mindful about these things. Thanks for taking time and helping me here. (: bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 09:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aaarts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The kashmir files amit shah 1200x768.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bimbisara Poster feat. Kalyan Ram Large.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 22:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adivi Sesh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Get WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page per WP:BRD. Also you using this userID and IP simultaneously is sock-puppetry and is ban-able. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for the advice, Fylindfotberserk; I wasn't aware of "edit-war" until now. I have been using only one account from various locations, Not sure what is leading/indicating towards sock-puppetry as I am only using this one and only account. I will use the Talk page to clear out the issue with editors with the data/insights that I believe are right/true and leave it upto another administrator to solve the issue. Thanks for taking time and sharing these insights. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Meet Cute Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetramind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to remove the alerts I made on your talk page, but reverting edits I made on articles without explanation and against policy (removing AfD notice before the discussion is closed) is not correct. I am happy to chat directly. I can imagine it's related to my nomination of Tetramind for deletion, an article you started. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 15:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I conclude that Paradoxodarap is stalking and reverting editors who voted Delete on the AfD. Do it again and I will report you. MarcGarver (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• MarcGarver (talk · contribs) Please check my reply on your other comment, I apologize for what may have looked like Retaliatory effort, it was a mistake/misunderstanding. Thank you.

(PS: It would be nicer if you can avoid threats, we are all here to contribute to Wikipedia and not get revenge :P cheer!)

bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 09:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MarcGarver (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Paradoxodarap, knock it off my friend. You continue your retaliatory wave of reverting and you will get your clean block log tainted. In no uncertain a tone, please cease and desist. Thank you for considering this in a positive way. Lourdes 16:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• MarcGarver, Hey I am sorry I didnt realize it until it was too late, I was going through your profile after you have tagged Tetramind for deletion. I Apologize to you for what I did, but please allow my to share my POV, When I visited your profile, I saw a lot of articles being edited mere seconds away from each other and each contribution had a [vandalism] button next to it, this is probably the first time i saw such button on a user profile. I did click on a few of those, by then I realized what it might result it. I am sorry if that may have felt retaliatory effort, it was my lack of awareness. and coming back to Tetramind, or any other submissions from my end, I would be very happy to re-write an article as many times as needed or even deleted from Wikipedia. I would not take it personally, except for my loss of time. However to stop this here, I am moving Tetramind to a draft and will resubmit via AfC once I believe its ready. Thank you, I can only hope for you to understand. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 09:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"When I visited your profile, I saw a lot of articles being edited mere seconds away from each other". The three article edits you reverted were made at 16:41, 18:03 and 18:06. I would not describe that as a few seconds apart. I will take your assurance at face value but recommend you avoid pressing buttons when you don't understand their function. MarcGarver (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

noted. will be careful. thank you. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Razesh Danda a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Razesh Danda. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Razesh Danda.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 07:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tetramind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetramind. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ritesh-rana-1400311.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Double Engine Album Art - Vivek Sagar Avanti Cinema.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Double Engine Album Art - Vivek Sagar Avanti Cinema.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Harshavardhan Rameshwar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://twitter.com/rameemusic and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 14:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Anvesh Michael on MC Joint.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.thenewsminute.com/telangana/meet-anvesh-michael-whose-series-kotha-poradu-showcases-rural-telangana-154102 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 14:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pooja-kolluru.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dacoit Teaser Title Sonu Mohkh MC Joint.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job for your work in the Telugu web space. Sorry for nominating Smaran, I withdrew the nomination. Just make sure not to use passing mentions and a neutral tone. DareshMohan (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thankyou for your contribution on English Wikipedia. Really Impressed! ~~ Milli's Boy (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking time and sharing this. You too have done commendable work @Milli's Boy.

bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. Thank you for your work on Double Engine (2024 film). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully requests goes through undeletion. If not, I need help expanding sandbox into article. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Nirudyoga_Natulu and User:DareshMohan/sandbox#Nirudyoga_Natulu. DareshMohan (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to contributing it. really appreciate the quality of work. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sheeshmahal Album Art on MC Joint 1200x1200bf-60.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karthik Sabareesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anannyaa Akulaa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anannyaa Akulaa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: When editing articles use a neutral tone, instead of a positive one. DareshMohan (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for notice, looking into it. Thank you! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hasya Movies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Hasya Movies until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Waltair Productions has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 26 § Waltair Productions until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your contributions here. While it is best to create articles after they have directed more than one film, I feel Vidyadhar Kagita satisfies Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals #3 The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work DareshMohan (talk) 00:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for kind words DareshMohan, I understand your advice and I will keep that in mind. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 06:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has come to light that many directors are more notable with more films with wiki links although some editors are on the fence about it. I will discuss it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Does one film guarantee notability?. DareshMohan (talk) 07:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Laxman Meesala. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Boleyn, I was still working adding sources, references and more information to the page, while still working on the article i took my lunchbreak. Thanks for moving it to draft, I will finish editing and then submit for review. Thanks again! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 16:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tetramind, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warsiguda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lingampally.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gaami First look poster with Release data.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of Hindi films of 2025 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Category:List of Hindi films of 2025. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, Will check and follow this. Thanks bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sikandar Salman Khan Rashmika Madanna AR Murugadoss Sajid nadiadwala.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON - wait for a bit more coverage of the film when it gets closer to release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mirai (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mdann52 (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On your article My Dear Donga, you used several unreliable sources. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_8#Cinejosh.com_and_Teluguone.com. DareshMohan (talk) 07:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted,. will check and rework the article! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikandar (2025 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikandar (2025 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pennar Industries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Double Engine Release poster.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BOVINEBOY2008 01:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone and fixed it up. I replaced the wrong license with the correct non-free license and added a non-free image rationale 122.104.180.11 (talk) 03:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laxman Meesala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page SprintRay, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 14:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Fancy Refrigerator, I dont fully understand what you are talking about, but I will surely go through your suggestions and work in accordance with WP Content policies. Thanks for the note, Much appreciate. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Paradoxodarap. Conflict of interest refers to any external relationship (outside of Wikipedia that is) you have with the person or group you are writing about. Are you in any way affiliated with SprintRay? If so, you have a conflict of interest. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Fancy Refrigerator, Thanks for explaining the COI guidelines. Just to clarify, I’m not connected to SprintRay in any way, nor am I paid by them. My main edits are usually about Indian cinema (you can see on my user page). I got interested in the 3D printing field recently, so I tried to create an article for SprintRay (as i believe it meets the notability guildelines for organization) out of curiosity about the tech. However, I think I am still making mistakes and If there’s anything specific you think should be adjusted, I’m open to feedback. Thanks again for the guidance! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even after revision, I am not confident that the article in its state meets the guideline on neutral point of view, especially with the way it describes the company’s partnership and products. I have moved it to draftspace, where you can continue to work on it. The company may be notable, but the page needs rework to conform to Wikipedia’s guidelines. Thanks. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 17:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Ill do that! Thanks again! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Vestrian24Bio. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pushpa 2: The Rule, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Vestrian24Bio,

I listed out 'Ashok bandreddi' name as coproducer after having seen the movie, There is no citation to support this, except the credits in the movie itself. However I understand the need for citation, and here in South Indian Film industry, its not a habit to mention all names in any media... I would grately appreciate if you could suggest any other alternate. Thank you. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Internet search brings up some sources (not RS), saying he co-produced the first film as well, but he is not mentioned in that Wikipedia page either. Perhaps, you could post at the talk page Talk:Pushpa 2: The Rule to ask other editors as well. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah,. I figured that as well, but yes, ill start a discussion on talk page. Thanks for the tip pal. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mirai (2025 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laxman Meesala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DareshMohan (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can suggest you to watch all of it, however, I started with Nirudyoga Natulu followed by Ajeeb Dastan(short) and then Story Discussion (S1 & 2)., If i am not mistaken, You can find it all ontheir YouTUbe/website. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mirai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Laxman Meesala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dance Ikon 2 Aha - The Cults Bay10x6.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hasya Movies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasya Movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradoxodarap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tetramind".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:BluntIsBlunt per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BluntIsBlunt. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Musalman Reboot Cover Art.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paradoxodarap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is to clarify my position regarding the recent concerns raised in SPI-BluntIsBlunt . I understand the need for transparency and accountability on Wikipedia, and I want to provide my perspective on the issues at hand.

cc: @Vanamonde93:, @The Wordsmith:

1. Sockpuppetry Allegations - I confirm that @Paradoxodarap is my own account and was used for standard Wikipedia contributions. - @MCJtalent was created solely for image uploads related to MC Joint’s work. It was not used to manipulate content but only to facilitate appropriate image licensing and uploads. - @Jigijigitaraka is an account owned by an offline friend with similar interests. While we have contributed to some of the same topics, I do not control or direct their edits. Our overlapping contributions are purely due to shared enthusiasm for Indian cinema.

2. Undisclosed Paid Editing (UPE) Concerns I have contributed to Wikipedia primarily as an enthusiast of Indian cinema and entertainment. While I acknowledge that some of my edits may have aligned with professional interests, my approach has always been to ensure that all edits adhered to Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and neutrality standards(Rohit-Sasi, Smaran etc). Many of my contributions were unpaid and done in the interest of improving content on Wikipedia. (Particularly that of Ritesh Rana or Deepa Dhanraj) - While I want to emphasize that none of my edits were made with the intention to mislead or deceive. While, I am will make a voluntary COI disclosure moving forward.

3. Image Licensing & Source Issues - Regarding the images uploaded via MCJtalent, I can provide evidence that they were properly released under Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0). Additionally, there might be some WebArchive links confirming that the original licensing information was available on TheCultsBay.com before the site went down. If required, I can check and submit for verification.

4. Editing Patterns & Overlapping Contributions - I understand that the similarity in editing topics with Jigijigitaraka may have raised concerns. However, these were not coordinated efforts to manipulate content but rather independent contributions within a shared niche of interest. I also have a history of editing unrelated articles, which demonstrates that my engagement on Wikipedia is not limited to any singular agenda.

5. Commitment to Compliance & Cooperation I believe I have spent good time understanding Wikipedia’s policies and am willing to take the following steps: - Adjust or remove any edits that may have unintentionally raised concerns. - Avoid editing certain articles, if required, to prevent conflicts of interest. - Provide additional documentation on image licensing, if necessary. - Follow any corrective measures deemed appropriate by the reviewing administrators.

Given my consistent contributions over the past four years, with nearly 1,100 edits, 154 article creations, and active engagement across multiple Wikimedia projects, I request a detailed review of my account history before any final decision regarding my status. My edit patterns, page creations, and collaborative work align with Wikipedia's commitment to expanding verifiable, well-sourced content—especially within the Indian entertainment industry. I urge the reviewing admins to examine my overall contributions and editing behavior to recognize the legitimacy of my work and the absence of any deliberate policy violations on my part. My account history should demonstrate a good-faith effort to enhance Wikipedia’s coverage of notable topics. In light of this, I respectfully request that my account be unblocked and reinstated, allowing me to continue making constructive contributions to the encyclopedia.

bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Deeply deceptive and incomplete unblock request. Does not acknowledge the multiple accounts operated by a single person in violation of WP:SOCK, does not acknowledge failures of disclosure per WP:PAID, and does not acknowledge previous deceptive behavior. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do you explain your statement at the SPI [1], where you insisted that you were unaffiliated with MC Joint, and unrelated to any of the accounts listed there? Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My initial response at SPI was meant to state that I was not using Wikipedia to promote MC Joint in a coordinated or undisclosed manner. However, I acknowledge that my phrasing may have been misleading. While I have worked on content related to MC Joint’s projects(Rohit-Sasi, Smaran, Vivek Sagar), I did not intend to obscure any association. While, I fully disclose that MCJtalent was created to facilitate image uploads for MC Joint’s work (with respect to image uploads)

Apart from that, any clients of MC Joint or not, or any other such entities that I have created articles for, were created in adherence with WP guidelines. I hope that answers your question adequately. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 17:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @@Vanamonde93: Please allow me to try that again. I sincerely apologize if my previous request came across as deceptive or incomplete and would like to clarify and take responsibility. I understand the importance of transparency and want to ensure full compliance with Wikipedia’s policies.

1. Conflict of Interest & Paid Editing Concerns I admit that I have a conflict of interest in articles related to individuals I have connections with (such as Rohit, Sasi, Avanti Cinema and Smaran). However, I want to clarify that I have not received any payment (cash or kind) for my edits, including those related to Sandhya Raju, Ritesh Rana or Deepa Dhandraj, which were purely based on personal interest [in appreciation, followed by a Google search and learning of them not having Wikipedia articles, despite their work in Performing Arts (Sandhya Raju), Entertainment Industry (Ritesh Rana) or Documentary works (Deepa Dhanraj)]. My intent has always been to improve Wikipedia’s coverage of Indian cinema while ensuring compliance with notability and verifiability guidelines.

2. Multiple Accounts & Overlapping Edits I acknowledge that I created MCJtalent to upload images with proper permissions and licenses. As for Jigijigitaraka, we are friends who discuss Wikipedia offline and share common interests, which may explain overlapping edits. However, we are separate individuals with independent control of our respective accounts. And I do not own or have any connection with the accounts TukTuki9005, Taffystone, Crazyflower007, HenryCavillu, MAKTUBishi, or Avatar-e-husn. While I do recollect seeing HenryCavillu edits in past, i do not know anything else about this or any of the other listed accounts.

3. Image Uploads & Licensing All images uploaded by my accounts (Paradoxodarap, MCJtalent) were either obtained with permission or sourced under Creative Commons 4.0 licenses, supported by VRT emails.

4. Disclosure of COI & Compliance with WP:PAID While my edits were always made in good faith and in compliance with notability and verifiability, I acknowledge that I should have disclosed potential COI more clearly. The articles I created, including those for Gaami’s director & producer (Vidyadhar Kagita and Karthik Sabareesh), were meant to highlight their achievements as newcomers in the industry. I understand the concerns raised and will exercise more caution in the future. as you can see a conversation with User: DareshMohan,^[1] while their notability was brought to questions by User: DareshMohan, we agreed that newcomers especially in industry like ours, can be notable while i was adviced to be more careful with such articles.

For that matter, any of the other articles created by me, have always been in compliance with WP Guidelines.

Addressing Perceived Deception & Commitment to Policy

• I request that my entire edit history be considered, as I believe it demonstrates a long-standing commitment to constructive contributions.
• I will disclose any COI-related edits and avoid directly editing subjects where I have a connection.
• I will follow COI guidelines, using talk pages instead of making direct edits.
• I will adhere strictly to one account (Paradoxodarap) and avoid any future use of multiple accounts for uploads or discussions.
• I am open to any corrective steps, restrictions, or mentorship that administrators deem necessary.

I appreciate your time in reviewing my request and hope for an opportunity to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Despite my account history and the time i have spent on the platform, and I am open to corrections, restrictions, or guidance from administrators to improve my compliance with policies. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 08:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 Hi again,

I have re-read the policies and would like to rewrite my appeal to address all the concerns raised:

WP:SOCK:

While I have been trying to explain the reasons behind the creation of multiple accounts (such as MCJtalent), I now fully acknowledge that using multiple accounts without clear disclosure violates WP:SOCK. I admit that I should have declared these on my user pages, and I regret not doing so.

WP:PAID & COI:

I realize that while I attempted to explain how my case differed from a typical paid editing scenario, I failed to address the conflict of interest that exists. Despite my intent being in good faith and my adherence to guidelines when creating articles, I did not disclose my COI with subjects like Rohit, Sasi, Avanti Cinema, Smaran, Pawon Ramesh, and Jagadeesh Prathap Bandari. I now understand that I should have declared these relationships on my user page and explored alternative ways to handle such articles. Consequently, significant contributions related to Sandhya Raju, Ritesh Rana, and Deepa Dhanraj may be affected and might even turn into redlinks.

I promise not to use multiple accounts for editing or uploads and will commit to using only my main account (Paradoxodarap) for all contributions. I will fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest in the future, either by clearly declaring them on my talk pages or by following the proper protocols before editing related articles. I am willing to learn from experienced editors—my interactions with User:DareshMohan demonstrate my intent to understand these issues better and to present myself more transparently.

I sincerely apologize for any confusion or deception my previous actions may have caused. I value my contributions to Wikipedia and am committed to improving my practices so that I fully comply with the guidelines. bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initially I thought you were a fan of Rohit-Sasi (with no COI) and their work but warned you not using positive tone (instead of neutral tone) at User talk:Paradoxodarap#Hats off hence I realized you were the only editor for Telugu indie content and gave encouragement. You need to use neutral tone. See Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Smaran. Your choice of words and the way you wrote the statement that Kotha Poradu made him famous is slightly over the top, do you agree? You also use the word making strides but I don't think he was that famous. DareshMohan (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Please file a new unblock request: a different CU will look at it. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]