Hello, Notsonotoriousbig!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 06:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notsonotoriousbig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jimfbleak,

I don't work for Coco Mercado and I'm not even from Venezuela or the USA, and I fail to see how a company such as Coco Mercado differs from Uber Eats, iFood or any of those gig economy companies. I wrote the article as a mean to expand Latin American topics, and the company is big enough to have it's article here. Besides, the article uses secondary reliable sources. Can you help me to rewrite it as to fit into Wikipedia standards? Notsonotoriousbig (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for speedy reply.

• Your sources are interviews with the founders, not independent verifiable sources
• it's all about what the company sells, little about the company organisation itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits. Although you gave a number of users and a claimed profit, they are just what the founder said.
• I've seen worse, but you need proper references and more, better verified, facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak Thank you for your reply. I have some free time in my hands today, do you mind if I try to write about another Latin American company and send to you for reviewing? I want to learn how to write "acceptable" articles. Notsonotoriousbig (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Venezuelan companies established in 2019 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bucket hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your edits to History of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Well-written, interesting to read, well-sourced, not copypasted. Excellent work. Lova Falk (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lova Falk Thank you very much! Notsonotoriousbig (talk) 16:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

David Gerard (talk) 23:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use crypto sources - we keep to solidly mainstream sourcing on crypto articles. Additionally, you really shouldn't be adding articles you claim you wrote as references, let alone edit-warring to keep them in - David Gerard (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]