I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Woodlem Education. Thanks! Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Could you please clarify what specific aspects of notability need further improvement? I would be happy to provide additional reliable sources or make necessary changes to strengthen the article.

Additionally, Woodlem Education is a fast-growing school chain in the UAE, expanding rapidly with multiple schools under its umbrella. Below are the Google listings for each school for your reference:

Woodlem Park School Jurf : https://g.co/kgs/TyU1L9m

Woodlem Park School Hamidiya : https://g.co/kgs/myQuPgZ

Woodlem British School Ajman : https://g.co/kgs/cY8fnZv

Woodlem Park School Dubai : https://g.co/kgs/RLBk8yo

Woodlem Park School Calicut : https://g.co/kgs/JweHxFD

Hampton Heights International School : https://g.co/kgs/bboz6oc

Dewvale School Al Quoz  : https://g.co/kgs/c52bsxg Nafranfanu (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Woodlem Education, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE❤️ 20:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nafranfanu. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nafranfanu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nafranfanu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE❤️ 20:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nafranfanu I recommend that you respond to this message. Ca ^{talk to me!} 04:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Woodlem Education. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nafranfanu, Please see WP:AN#User:Nafranfanu activity at Woodlem Education. You can respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2025 (UTC) |[reply]

Hello Nafranfanu, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Noufal Ahmed, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noufal Ahmed.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 09:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nafranfanu, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Woodlem Education, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodlem Education.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 09:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]