Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Japan–Portugal relations, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Adakiko, The removed paragraph in repeating itself in this article Slavery in Japan making redundant and difficult to read in Japan–Portugal relations. I do not understand the great emphasis in the later. The updated version makes the article easy to read and diversifies on other aspects of the relation between both countries.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MrNunchaku (talk • contribs) 01:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the removal large amounts of cited content on the talk page and get wp:consensus before removal. See help:talk pages and wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't link words that most English speakers know. England, Ireland, Russia, Denmark, Italy, Sweden. See wp:overlink. Please do not add unsourced links as Theodore Mantels. Please wp:WTAF. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 11:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Theodore Mantels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrNunchaku! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Pescaterian per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pescaterian. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Izno Yes... I am Pescaterian. No, this is not a sockpuppet account. It is my new account, since my original account was indefinably blocked. I dont understand why I keep getting blocked... So, basically you are telling me, I cant be a wiki editor??? Why? What did I do wrong? All I am trying to do is contribute, but instead I get blocked. MrNunchaku (talk) 11:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi! If you have been blocked on your original account, what you should do is to appeal the block on that same account, rather than create a new one. Blocks are usually aimed at a user, not a specific account, and creating a new account can be seen as trying to evade your block. I invite you to take a look at our page explaining inappropriate uses of alternative accounts to understand the situation better.

While you have been blocked, you can still request an unblock, ideally from your original account if you still have access to it. Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks provides more information, as well as Wikipedia:Standard offer which administrators might suggest in your situation. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My original account shouldn't have been blocked in the first time... The person who originally blocked me, would never unblock me despite me being right. Administrators will always uphold their views and discharge those of others, because of their position. Anyway, it is too late for me... Wikipedia is overrun by lifeless losers. You try to contribute and you get banned instead... MrNunchaku (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the administrators reviewing your block will not be the same as the one who originally blocked you. Successful unblock requests do happen, but they require understanding what happened (even if the original block might have been wrong!) and being willing to listen. Personally attacking the people who might unblock you is not helpful. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]