Hi MaxineJP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, making a new wiki page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
77		2022 Illinois Secretary of State election (talk)	Add sources
13		Rita B. Garman (talk)	Add sources
28		Dioxin affair (talk)	Add sources
669		Modern portfolio theory (talk)	Add sources
195		Primacy of Peter (talk)	Add sources
20		Cordaid (talk)	Add sources
2,543		Nintendo Entertainment System (talk)	Cleanup
1,732		Zelda Williams (talk)	Cleanup
3		Chile and the World Bank (talk)	Cleanup
997		Medicare (United States) (talk)	Expand
3,908		5G (talk)	Expand
1,417		Flanders (talk)	Expand
795		Wednesday (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
428		E-commerce payment system (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55		CIC (Nintendo) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
383		COVID-19 vaccination mandates in the United States (talk)	Merge
18		Self Help Africa (talk)	Merge
30		Biden Administration COVID-19 action plan (talk)	Merge
131		Nintendo 64 technical specifications (talk)	Wikify
478		Single Euro Payments Area (talk)	Wikify
118		United Kingdom membership of the European Economic Area (talk)	Wikify
14		Thomas S. Winter (talk)	Orphan
3		Carolyn Brown Mosby (talk)	Orphan
8		Private exchange (talk)	Orphan
4		Majority Leader of the Illinois House of Representatives (talk)	Stub
55		Irreligion in Belgium (talk)	Stub
4,082		SPFS (talk)	Stub
18		Petros Kyprianou (talk)	Stub
4		Orland Park 143rd Street station (talk)	Stub
15		John McIntyre (publisher) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Final state-by-state RCP polling averages, 2016 U.S. presidential election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't an article, we aren't a directory or database mirroring a particular organization's data.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 20:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Final state-by-state RCP polling averages, 2020 U.S. presidential election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't an article, we aren't a directory or database mirroring a particular organization's data.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 20:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MaxineJP, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Frost joyce per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frost joyce. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxineJP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I just logged in and its saying I'm blocked because of "Frost joyce". I'm sorry but what is Frost joyce? The individual who blocked me wrote something about a "credible tip". Also I went to the investigation page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Frost_joyce) and I clicked everything on that page, and I am sorry but I do not see any proof of anything on there. I think there is some mix up and you have me confused with someone else. Please unblock me. Thank you! MaxineJP (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your denial is not sufficient for an unblock and your evidence section below is insubstantial. PhilKnight (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi,

I just got notice that my account is blocked. I’m sorry but I take issue with this. There is some huge mistake.

I emailed @Moneytrees much of the following. And I am posting it here because I think the Wikipedia community needs to see this.

So Moneytrees blocks me and says they got a “solid tip” about me? Is this a joke?

First, I do not know what "Frost joyce" is. What does that have to do with me?

I clicked this link he put on the block notice on my user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Frost_joyce

Okay. It lists accounts and says we are sockpuppets. Under that it lists the "tools" used to discover this.

I've never seen these tools before, so I clicked on them.

Well the first tool is this one. it shows me and two other accounts I’ve never heard of, with our edit counts. It shows three accounts and different edit counts. Then it has a table saying Minimum Between Edits. That table is totally blank. Okay. What is this supposed to mean then?

The next tools in this person’s toolbox was this one: https://interaction-timeline.toolforge.org/?wiki=enwiki&user=Frost+joyce&user=Call+me+maestro

It says interaction timeline and "no results".

If someone could explain what is going on, I would greatly appreciate it. This is a huge mistake. Thank you! MaxineJP (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes hi @Moneytrees. You wrote this: "A mix of behavioral and technical evidence (credit to a private tip) convinces me of a connection between these accounts and the sockmaster. More info on CUwiki." What is CUwiki, and may I please have a link to it? Thank you.

Hi @User:Doug Weller. I got your name because you posted something on my talk page a while back. I assume you are an administrator. Can you please look at my block and read what I wrote above. I don't know who to turn to? There is some huge mixup. Someone blocked my account. They posted a strange and vague reason. And then all the "tools" they used for evidence (like the Interaction Timeline and the Minimum Time Between Edits) are all showing blank results. So doesn't that vindicate me? Please go click them and see for yourself. I feel like I'm going crazy. Please help. MaxineJP (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CUwiki is only for CheckUsers, not even Admins can see it unless they are a CheckUser. I'm not getting involved with this, no time. Doug Weller talk 09:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]