Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lesion. Thank you for your work on Internal rectal prolapse. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article on internal rectal prolapse, differentiating it from the broader rectal prolapse article. The article here is well-developed, although the Rectal prolapse still has much on this topic (not just the content in the Internal rectal prolapse section). So, over time, it may be worth moving some of that content over to here (or deleting it from that page) in order to differentiate the content more clearly. Certainly a summary should remain on that page. I can see that you have a 'to do' list on the talk page, which is helpful for showing a direction of travel. Overall, I think that having this discussion separately discussion now is reasonable. I had wondered whether 'internal rectal intussusception' would be better (technically more correct), but for a broader audience 'prolapse' might be better.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lesion. Thank you for your work on Stapled trans-anal rectal resection. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this helpful, well-referenced article from a long-standing redirect. I checked this was a genuinely new article (not just re-instating the old redirect); it's well referenced. I note that your infobox has an 'edit on Wikidata' page, but given that there was no entry on Wikidata, that was problematic. I've added one, as a starting point.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]