Hello, Lchung9779!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 05:59, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, King the Land, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blogs are considered as unreliable source per WP:UGC; Naver Blogs are considered as unreliable source per WP:KO/RS and WP:UGC. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks for fixing my mistake! I just added a new source that I believe to be more reliable. Lchung9779 (talk) 04:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lchung9779. Thank you for your work on California Academy of Sciences Fellows. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It is impossible to establish notability to a collective group of fellows. Please merge the content to California Academy of sciences.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to California Academy of Sciences Fellows. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Not an appropriate topic for an encyvlopedia. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]