I would like to apply for a permanent IP block exemption. As noted above, I recently had a temporary IP block exemption. This trial period was, I believe, conducted successfully. I am now applying for a permanent exemption, for the same reasons, i.e. I am shortly about to go on holiday and will be using my VPS, and Q4 of WP:BLOCKFAQ still applies. Many thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent exemptions are not granted; the most that you can get is a year. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @331dot. Can I then please get the exemption for the next year? Kiwipete (talk) 07:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, all set. 331dot (talk) 07:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu • teacups 05:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Kiwipete, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to your undid revision 1272194817 related to the article on Robert Badinter, French Constitutional (Supreme) Court Justice, the title of Senator was provided to him by the WMC, see link [1]. 87.116.182.94 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are making a ton edits without providing a valid reason. Please stop doing this. This does not help Wikipedia in any way, and amounts to unconstructive editing. Jlktutu (talk) 07:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain what edits, and why you think I am not providing a valid reason? Kiwipete (talk) 07:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on using the summary "Use TERYT template". I cannot opine on why you don't provide a valid reason, only you can answer that. Jlktutu (talk) 07:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you think that "Use TERYT template" is not a valid reason. If you look at these edits, you will see that I am replacing references to a slighty incorrect Polish government website with an up-to-date version. Plus the template includes instructions in English of how to perform a search. Do you think I can improve my edit summary at all? Kiwipete (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. You've been doing a ton edits, over the past few days. All with the same summary. If this is in good faith, then it is OK. Jlktutu (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will restore the last few edits that you reverted. Kiwipete (talk) 07:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a valid reference and there's nothing incorrect about the fact I added about Schick. Why did you remove? I've been adding things for years and always add reference from reliable source. Censorship is wrong. Don't make me escalate this. Good day. Photolarry (talk) 01:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Photolarry, the reason I removed this entry was because is does not meet the requirements of WP:EVENTDOY, specifically "Events ... should be the subject of a Wikipedia article". I also see that despite following the "Discuss" step of WP:BRD where it states "don't restore your bold edit", you have gone ahead and re-added the entry. I'll remove it again, and I would suggest that if you still feel it should be added, you first seek consensus on the article's talk page. Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Literally every date has a section for Events! This is a very significant event and should be included both on the date and on Jacob Schick page. Not sure why this is such a big deal for you. I've added far less important things that no moderators objected to. No idea why this should be anything but minor editing. There's no reason the article reference would be false. But whatever. I have very things to worry about. I'm not going to "petition" for something on talk page. That'll never work. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Photolarry (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]