Article has been protected by you but is still the target of BLP edit warring. Bump up in protection level is clearly needed.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 04:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rev/del. Knitsey (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Wikipedia won't be the same without the contributions of those IPs. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They're like buses, you wait around for abusive messages, then they all turn up at once. Sheesh. Knitsey (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian Karma02 (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You (first with an IP, now with a single-purpose account) have been edit warring incessantly to add poorly sourced information. The alternative to protection would have been to block you from editing. Favonian (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian

Then please change age 8 and add correct information before locking it. Age 8 of her marriage is totally wrong Karma02 (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian

I wasn't the one who editing poorly sourced information .

Someone changed the real information and added her age as 8 . That was the wrong information . Not the one i added. Karma02 (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian

I suggest you look at the edit history

The initial 16 years of age Was edited by certain username to 8 to defame and with no research. Rukmini'age at time of marriage was more than 16. I hope you edit changes Karma02 (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian

U shouldn't let the page show false information

Please edit the correct information to the page. Karma02 (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can u change the wrong information!!!!

@Favonian Karma02 (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		For taking care of this disruption. I appreciate it! JeffSpaceman (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick resolution and cleanup on that one. It looks like I forgot to tick the checkuser box when filing it, would you have any objection to me changing the {{SPI case status}} from closed to CU? The LTA usually operates different accounts for different sets of articles. Belbury (talk) 10:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you'd already noticed it. Thanks again! Belbury (talk) 10:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]