Hello DJ71park! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Hey, I just reverted your additions to said list. Since it is only about the top (first) ranking cadet of each class they are not eligible here; though there are several other USMA lists where they might belong. Anyway thanks for writing about military history, hope you continue with your work. Regards ...GELongstreet (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thanks so much for the note. Yeah I was definitely confused on this list. I get it now. Thanks again. DJ71park (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. You'll find lots of those lists linked within the article List of United States Military Academy alumni. Meanwhile should you ever want more information or structure about editing on the general topic or want to find likewise interested editors you can take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. ...GELongstreet (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I will take a look. Thanks. DJ71park (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DJ71park. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Fitzwilliam (Long Range Nuclear Detection), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is so special about the class of 1933? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’ve been doing quite a lot of research lately in many different operations during and post WW2 and I keep finding so many class of 1933 cadets playing major roles in them. I have a few more articles I’m working now that were all run by them as well. From my research into West Point it looks like the army was having a hard time getting graduates to stay with them after graduation during the 1920’s and that they did a push to keep them right around 1933. 1933 was the largest class they had ever had and many of them stayed in the army. They were just the right age to be most of the Colonels going into WW2. Also the army liked to put USMA classmates together as it created an easy working environment. Anyway I’ve only started the list but 1933 is filled with incredibly notable WW2 vets. All that said it probably would be interesting to have a separate category for many of the years. DJ71park (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is already one for the class of 1915 ("The class the stars fell on") but that is a very renowned year, as it produced more generals than any other, and included Dwight Eisenhower and Omar Bradley. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DJ71park. Thank you for your work on William Henry Baumer Jr.. Another editor, Rodney Baggins, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congratulations on your first Wikipedia article. As it's quite substantial, I've spent some time checking it over and have assessed it as C-class. I'm not sure we should be italicizing the operation names, so I've put them in normal font, but if you disagree and want to make them stand out then I wouldn't object to you putting the italics back. It's just that when you link through to the related wiki articles, their titles are not italicized so it's a consistency thing. There are a few unsourced paragraphs but I've not bothered to tag them at the moment. That might come up at the GA stage further down the line. I tend to think the section "Trip to Moscow – from Baumer's diary" is overly long and detailed so I've tagged it for attention. We do need to stick to the war-related non-trivial stuff, so you could try cutting it down a bit. That section also relies heavily on one source (the diary, ref [6]) with no page numbers stated. Suggest using the {{rp}} template to specify a page number for each diary ref tag ([6]). Ideally, some of the information in that section might also be backed up with one or more additional secondary sources. Other than that, it's good to go. Regards, Rodney Baggins (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rodney Baggins}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Category:Graduates of the United States Military Academy Class of 1933 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 14:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Space Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William H. Pickering.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen that you're working on pages for 1933 graduates of West Point. If you want any assistance on said pages, I'd be willing to help when I have some free time, as I've got a decent selection of material and they overlap with my general interests. Just reach out and I'll see what I can do. Rob9980 (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for reaching out. This is my first list and they are quite a bit of work. Would be great to have some help for sure. I haven’t co-worked on a page before and not sure what the best practices are. I know when 2 people edit at the same time it causes a conflict. Have you had experience doing this before? DJ71park (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unless we were to edit at different times, it's not really possible. The best way I can help is probably by working on the pages of individual graduates, and getting them into the best shape I can humanly do. I've got every volume of Cullum's prior to 9 in PDF form, and I'm looking into acquiring later volumes in physical form. From there, it should aid your work in making the list. Rob9980 (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry for the slow reply. Yes this could be very helpful but sounds like a crazy amount of work. Seems like you do have some great resources. Some of the 1933 cadets are really easy to track down info on and thers are like ghosts. So any help would be appreciated for sure. Thanks. DJ71park (talk) 19:46, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I2Overcome. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nelson P. Jackson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I₂Overcome ^talk 12:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for letting me know about this. It was an error as I usually leave details about any changes I make and will double check from now on. Best. DJ71park (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nelson P. Jackson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. I₂Overcome ^talk 14:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this. It was an error on my behalf and will double check that I leave full details every time. Thanks DJ71park (talk) 12:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nelson P. Jackson Aerospace Memorial Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]