Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Thank you for your revert of my well sourced edits on the Bernadine Evaristo page. I would very grateful for your eyes on imy editt to Stabbing of Salman Rushdie where I seem to be in a similar dispute. I have left careful notes on . Talk:Stabbing of Salman Rushdie CoalsCollective (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CoalsCollective One major difference is that you have cited reliable sources in the article about the stabbing, while your edits at the Evaristo article relied solely on X/Twitter posts. Thus, the Evaristo edits were revertable under the WP:RS and WP:BLP policies; by contrast, the stabbing edit becomes more of a content dispute. —C.Fred (talk) 12:50, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. On the Evaristo article you were kind enough to replace my content, which you were also kind enough to describe as well sourced, after it had been reverted by @Championofwriters . My edits on the Evaristo article were based on reliable sources too: I would never just use twitter posts.

I would be very grateful if you could comment on the Stabbing edit. I have worked very hard to create a neutral, balanced, well sourced content and genuinely do not understand what I am doing wrong. CoalsCollective (talk) 13:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CoalsCollective Again, the difference is a clear procedural one: another editor deleted text backed up with reliable sources and replaced it with text backed up only with Twitter/X post, and that's a violation of WP:BLP. There is no violation at the stabbing article. It's a content dispute, both sides are present sound policy-based reasons for their edits, and I do not have an opinion on whether to include the material. Further, since I approached the article as an administrator rather than an editor, I need to be cautious about not expressing an opinion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for your time. CoalsCollective (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

• Jarry1250
• Lethe

CheckUser changes

• AmandaNP
• Drmies

Oversighter changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
• A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
• A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.

Technical news

• A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
• Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

• The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.

I understand that semi presidential does not have head of state and head of government But I have proof that there do have it Jochongpresidents (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jochongpresidents I suggest you explain on the talk page how they fit into those categories and not the ones they're currently listed in. —C.Fred (talk) 02:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before I get explain to you, I am going to answer the question the ones they're currently listed.

This list I made are still going to keep them in these categories they are currently listed.

This list I made is the listbof all of the semi presidential countries that has the president as head of state and head of government and I have proof about it.

1. On section 1 of chapter vii in sri lanka constitution, it said that there shall be a president of the republic of sriclanka who is the head of state, the head of executive, head of government, and the commander in chief.
2. On article 118 of peru constitution, it said that the president duty is to manage general government poilcy where is normally the prime minister job in this system
3. For Egypt, russia, South Korea, and Phillipines, they are Dictatorship countries at the time in semi presidential system. I did Google research on dictatorship and usually the dictator are head of state and head of government because of absolute power. To show you that they are former or currently have this system, I put parentheses to show you if they are currently or formerly a semi presidential countries. If you saw this (1972 to 1986) that means they are former countries. If they have just (Dictatorship) that means that the current countries that have this system with Dictatorship

Jochongpresidents (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

does this answer your topic Jochongpresidents (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jochongpresidents That's a matter you'd need to discuss at the article's talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help at Talk:Indian River Shores, Florida.

This editor is intent on including their content in the lead of the article--that Indian River Shores is a rich community--despite opposition.

This single-purpose editor has been warned and reverted, and efforts to discuss their edits have repeatedly been deleted.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]