The Subversion of Christianity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Roe was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Patriarchy instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We don't appear to have any articles on specific thinkers' conceptions of patriarchy and usually we wouldn't have something like that unless it was a very significant view that had attracted a lot of commentary from others, e.g. Marx's theory of alienation. It doesn't look like Graeber's theory of patriarchy is there (yet). It therefore would probably be best to integrate this into the main article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patriarchy (Graeber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Joe (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aristoxène! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Joe (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aristoxène,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, participate in edit drives, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

We also have a mailing list if you'd like to be notified of upcoming edit drives.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, @Aristoxène, I've really been sleeping - I knew I'd come here to find that czar had beaten me to the punch, but by three months?! I'm delighted to see someone working on 19th-century French anarchists. Welcome! -- asilvering (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Hello and thank you for welcoming me. I didn't thank @Czar at the time because I was on the 'not talking to anyone and be discreet' mood since I was harassed on the FR:WP by some users. So I do it here at the same time too. I have some obligations I have to do in the near-future but I'm trying to buy 'Léauthier l'anarchiste' in the coming weeks, I feel that this book, even though not to be found online, will help me do the Léauthier page ofc but also the 1894 anarchist 'bagnard' revolt, which seems to be the only revolt in the history of the Bagne - kinda cool. So we'll see about that but I'm sure it is interesting ! Thank you again to both of you :) Aristoxène (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of the first/1999 edition in storage. :) Always happy to help get scans of any passages you need. czar 13:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar Hey, I answer only now but because I planned to go see in some bookstores if I could find it, and indeed I found it + I found the book of Bouhey, which I read a bit and it's indeed a big banger lol, so I will be able to use that very clearly, at least to correct the EoA page which I wrote before and needs to be improved and clarified and more organized, I feel like. But at least I have those two books to help :) Thank you for your help though, I thought I was gonna agree to your generous offer in the case I couldn't find it but since I did, well... Aristoxène (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Anarchy (essay). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 03:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Aristoxène, and thank you for creating several biographies of women. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might like to join WikiProject Women in Red, where we are trying to improve coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up and welcome to Women in Red. In connection with future biographies, you might find it useful to follow the guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing and Seasons Greetings!--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christos Konstantinidis (anarchist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freedom (newspaper). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ierusalima Gligor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced, no particular assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Euripides

added a link pointing to Brill

Women in Greece

added a link pointing to Brill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Olga Papasarandou, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aristoxène. Thank you for your work on Jean-Pierre François (anarchist). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for bringing across this translation (and for your original work in French). Note that page should only have categories that exist. Of course, it's always possible to make categories ... Also, you have quite a few red-links. It might be helpful, when constructing pages, to use inter-language links (see template:ill) to the corresponding French article (for example), if there is a corresponding page in another language.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle:[1] 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

So this is really bizarre, but I'm constantly getting notifications like "Aristoxène‬ mentioned you on the ‪Saint-Germain bombing‬ talk page", with a pointer to a diff that, as far as I can tell, does not actually mention me anywhere! Any idea what could be causing this? The only link I can think of is that I've been active on Zizians, which is a part of Wikiproject Anarchism, but I don't understand how that could possible cause mentions from other pages. Jpatokal (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jpatokal :)

First of all, I obviously want to say that I don’t know you, and if you’re receiving such notifications, it’s certainly not my intention. Has this only happened on this newly created page, or on other pages I’ve created as well? And does it only affect discussion pages, in which case I suppose one of the added projects is identifying you? In any case, please know that I have no idea how this is happening, but we can try to look into it—I don’t know. Aristoxène (talk) 09:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. I've received half a dozen of these notifications by now, including these: [1], [2], [3]. All seem to involve you adding the same template to Talk pages. Jpatokal (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpatokal It is possible that I copied and pasted these projects from a different page (or multiple pages) that dealt with similar topics, and then I copied and pasted them with more or less modification depending on the pages created. It could be that some kind of invisible tag identifies you because you may have participated in the original talk page where I took these projects from. In any case, this is the only hypothesis that seems relevant and possibly somewhat true to me. Otherwise, I cannot say, and it would be best to check with Wikipedia authorities directly.

For the next pages I create, I will try to avoid this issue by rewriting the text from scratch instead of copying and pasting. I hope this will resolve the problem, but if not, let me know, and we can ask Wikipedia directly. Aristoxène (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpatokal Did you receive a notification for Joseph Jas-Béala ? Aristoxène (talk) 01:47, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. I don't think it has anything to do with the text you are entering, but it's somehow tied to the templates that are getting expanded. I'll file a bug once I can figure out where this belongs. Jpatokal (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say this :) you can avoid sending out pings by not adding your signature, which you don't have to do anyway. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron Thank you very much for that info, or we would have been looking for a long time lol. I would like to create Talk pages without the signature, in fact, and if you check all the pages created, you can see that I systematically remove the signature in the second edit made on the talk pages, because I thought it was unavoidable that the signature be added in the creation. If you can tell me how to avoid putting this signature, it would be great and like that we could avoid this kind of problems ^^ Aristoxène (talk) 09:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're using the mobile web interface, if you click "Add topic" (blue button) it'll automatically include a signature as if you're starting a new discussion but if you click "Create" at the top of the page, you can edit the wikitext directly without creating a new discussion and adding a signature. czar 13:12, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello here @Czar, thanks for that, I'll try that next time. I didn't know that this was possible. Well, for the next ones I will try to to that without signature (I use the web basic version though) and hopefully the issue will be resolved and Jpatokal will stop receiving notifications on the pages of obscure 19th century anarchists lol. Aristoxène (talk) 14:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you can also use scripts like WP:RATER to add wikiprojects. If you're adding the same ones over and over it's going to be easier to copy and paste them like you've been doing, but rater is pretty handy otherwise. -- asilvering (talk) 16:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Thank you for the tip, I'll check that out when needed if I remember (not sure but hey !) Thank you a lot though Aristoxène (talk) 13:54, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anarchist Barnstar
		Lately I've seen you doing a lot of amazing work writing and improving articles on the French anarchist terrorists of the 1890s. Your work is very much appreciated, and I look forward to reading more from you in the future! --Grnrchst (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot, I see that you are with Czar and a few others one of the main participants to the project, so I receive your message with a lot of consideration and thank you profusely too ! Aristoxène (talk) 15:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]