I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Resilience (mathematics). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resilience (mathematics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Afonso Dimas Martins! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 🌙Eclipse 🌹 ⚧ (she/they/it • talk • edits) 16:10, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Afonso Dimas Martins. Thank you for your work on Culiseta bergrothi. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

An appropriately structured article for a species; thanks for linking through Wikidata.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Afonso Dimas Martins. Thank you for your work on Culiseta niveitaeniata. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I was rather glad of the Devi et al (2019) reference, otherwise I was wondering whether it had been seen since 1907! Thanks for creating the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashmina Ranjit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashmina Ranjit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Afonso Dimas Martins, and welcome to Women in Red. Thanks for all the women's biographies you've created over the past few days. I hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Clotilde García Borrero. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 14:10, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Afonso Dimas Martins. Thank you for your work on Misogyny: The World's Oldest Prejudice. Another editor, LEvalyn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It would be great if the reception section included some reviews and post-publication information about the book. I found one published review in Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement here.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|LEvalyn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:37, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LEvalyn: Thank you, I have incorporated that review! Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 06:48, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]