Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hello Adeletron 3030. You placed an advert tag on the Dana Gluckstein article. Please provide examples of promotion content so I can remediate the situation. Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 09:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Hi, thank you for responding. Overall, I thought the writing came off as promotional, and after a bit of searching, I found that some of your phrasing is directly copied from Gluckstein's promotional material. Needless to say, Wikipedia:Plagiarism should be avoided. My suggestion would be:

• Don't copy phrases or paraphrase closely. Explain things in your own words.
• Avoid long lists, like in the "Notable portrait photographs" section and "...spark meaningful discussions of racism, colonialism, indigeneity, sustainability, stewardship, justice, care, and healing".
• Avoid flowery phrasing like "A pivotal career chapter came in 2010" and "spark meaningful discussions"

I think the issue is that the text is written with the intent to impress and make a point, which is fine if you're writing a marketing blurb for a photographer. A Wikipedia article should be much drier, i.e. "This happened in this year. And then this happened. After that, this happened." Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 17:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you again for your prior comments. I have made some updates, however maybe my lack of perspective has not fully remediated your concerns. I would sincerely appreciate your additional input in resolving the current issue tags.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you're being paid to write this article - which is fine! - you should disclose it at Talk:Dana Gluckstein. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 17:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not being paid. Thanks for the input. Your observations are legit. I will take another stab at this.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Thanks again for replying here and being receptive. Much appreciated! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 18:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will message the Gluckstein photo uploader requesting additional information.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 04:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adeletron3030. Has the Dana Gluckstein article been sufficiently cleaned up to remove the tags?Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Sorry for not responding you sooner. I think the article looks good. I'm still not sure about the paragraph that begins The United States was one of only four votes against UNDRIP when it was originally adopted..." To me, it's too much detail about the impact of the book. Anyway, nominating for Good Article will get you more actionable and detailed feedback that I could hope to. Thanks for your work on this! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. I submitted a Good article nomination. Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soon you are gonna be reported to the administrators. THANK YOU. 100jan0vski (talk) 03:08, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski Okay, go ahead and do that. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 10:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to keep my photos because i spend a lot of time to upload them, i'm a new Wikipedian and i need a help about the policy of pics, yes the pics are from the net not by me, i don't hide that fact. And i also want to keep them and I'm open for to cooperate about everything. 100jan0vski (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski Wikipedia has a pretty strict image use policy (please click the links and read them!) and unfortunately, your own uploads do not meet the guidelines. You're welcome to take photographs yourself or find images that are in the public domain. But almost none of the images you find on the web are compatible with Wikipedia.

Also, you did kinda hide the fact that they weren't your images when you marked them as your own work and removed the "no permission" tags. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 19:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okey i want to keep them, can you please help me? Because you are a experienced and I'm a rookie 100jan0vski (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski The only way to keep them is you contacting the copyright holders directly and asking them to release the photographs under a license that allows any use or modification, and then submit the copyright release to the volunteer response team. As the uploader, ensuring that images are correctly sourced and licensed is your responsibility. That's all the help I can offer. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 20:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The photos are from internet how i can found them or to contact the authors or copyrighters? Also some pics are old this a nonsense thing, and i'm pretty sure they even didn't know that them pics are somewhere uploaded so can we keep this like a secret? 100jan0vski (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski If you found the photo on Facebook, contact the Facebook page admin. If you found the photo on a website, contact the website admin. If you don't want to do that, then don't upload other people's content. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 20:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The pics are from all of the internet and i can't contact them neither pics are from some web or Facebook, that's is the problem and that's the reason why i write nonsense, also they took them from someone else and they're not the real authors, when i choice what to upload i choose only copied material not an the original one 100jan0vski (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski Like I said, Wikipedia image use policies are strict and they're enforced. I've given you all the help I can and the rest is up to you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 22:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What i can do while i'm blocked? Nothing. So do we have some other solutions? I admitted that i uploaded an stolen material who someone other stolen also from some other and person that material it's not mine i just borrowed it what did you want next from me i write you everything about all the situation 100jan0vski (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@100jan0vski I would respond to the deletion discussion that's linked on your talk page. I'd reach out to the reviewer who blocked you and explain how you understand you broke the rules and you will not upload other people's material without their permission again. And make sure you understand the copyright policy. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 22:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I did most of the writing for that section but I kind of have to create a weird way of being neutral. Writing is kind of a mixed bag for me and I kind of want to be a little careful of how things are phrased. I'm sure down the road we'll have a section that is dedicated to controversies.

Obviously compared to 2018 and 2022, there is a lot less controversy in terms of hosting choice beyond the fact there are multiple hosts and stuff with either Trump, the U.S. government, or the local state governments. I understand it's not perfect and I would agree on that but I don't really have much to actually work with. HalfOfAnOrange (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HalfOfAnOrange I think the issue you're running into is you're adding information about things that could potentially be issues. But Wikipedia articles are about things that have happened and things that exist. Yes, all those things you could talk about could be issues, but they aren't yet.

Also, if you want to talk about concerns, they should be attributed to specific people, not general groups of people. Does this all make sense? Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 02:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That's why I changed the focus away from Trump in general and more to the travel bans which are tied to him and were a prevoius and now current concern. HalfOfAnOrange (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that was a good shift in focus. Thanks for doing that. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 11:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lorde Solar Power censored cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]