Archives

2011–2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

From this please see what you can add since I don't have desktop access for the moment. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is anything to add from that which isn't already in the article. In the future, you should add possible sources like this to the ref ideas list at the talk page. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adrift (The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adrift (The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Adrift (The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power) for comments about the article, and Talk:Adrift (The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 09:44, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed in my recent reply, you're continually attempting to shut down my contributions with bad faith actions. I've seen it happen to other users in the thread who are also calling you out.

I've told trailblazer the same, now i'm informing you. You will be ignored moving forward. Either engage in good faith or find someone else to bother.

~~ 2A02:C7C:8469:C700:DFE:9473:9A46:C55D (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore me all you want, we aren't going to stop answering just because you don't like what we are saying. - adamstom97 (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then your answers will be a waste of time, it's no skin off my back

~~ 2A02:C7C:8469:C700:DFE:9473:9A46:C55D (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The person who is wasting time is you, for this kind of behaviour is not going to get you anywhere on Wikipedia where collaborating with other editors is required. - adamstom97 (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing other editors of bad faith just because you don't agree with them has a boomerang effect and makes it even more unlikely for others to implement what you are essentially demanding. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	Heyyo, just wanted to formally share my appreciation for you as an editor in these tense times. :) It's a new world, alright. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the discussion 16 mm vs 16mm film, I have created a request for comment on the MOS:NUM talk page. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page, which can be found here: RfC on film gauge styling. Nikoledood (talk) 13:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deadpool & Wolverine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even though character information is important, is it necessary to add to each item the project in which it occurs? That is, we can't just mention the event? Marco camino 10 (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is fine to have them, with that level of detail it may seem overly vague to not say when it happened. If it ends up feeling too specific later we can remove them. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Two, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joss Whedon was hired to "contribute creatively" to each film in Phase Two of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, in addition to writing and directing Avengers: Age of Ultron? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Two. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Two), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a reminder that you haven't replied to the discussion we were having about sourcing at the above page. Thanks. Tduk (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]