Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of Birmingham have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: History of Birmingham was changed by 37.60.109.179 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971415 on 2023-01-09T08:05:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Liu1126. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Faron Moller—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liu1126 (talk) 14:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faron Moller. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoe Killington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 37.60.109.179! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]