Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Phil Foden, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 156.61.250.249! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:RS. Seasider53 (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BLPNAME. GiantSnowman 17:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Adrienne Posta. Binksternet (talk) 13:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:54, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled. My source for the edit is this:

^[1]

If you're happy with the quality and unblock I'll add it in.@Ohnoitsjamie: 156.61.250.249 (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to include the source with the edit, which you failed to do here and here and here and here. It's not the responsibiility of other editors to hunt down sources for material you are adding. You've been given many warnings regarding this. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Kojey Radical source is Evening Standard of 16 March. If you unblock I'll add it in. @Ohnoitsjamie: 156.61.250.249 (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to unblock you given how many warnings you've had. When this block expires, you will be expected to include sources with all WP:BLP additions. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]