Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Welcome!
Hello 123.103.210.114!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (123.103.210.114) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I undid your latest contributions to Saudis because you failed to cite a reliable, neutral source. The news article that you cited only shows the opinion of a politician, not a fact. Please discuss your changes on the article's talk page and see Wikipedia:Edit warring. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page. ❯❯1subAtomic(Talk)11:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
September 2020
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Always cite any addition you made in especially BLP (F5pillar---/ 'Messager🖋📩) 06:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
And read my edit summary. It's not about the source; firstly, what you have added is factually incorrect, and secondly, the information you added is arguably irrelevant to the topic of the article (hence my request to discuss it on the talk page of the article). Your lack of edit summary and use of bare urls don't help. Please use the talk page, if you are at all interested in becoming a better editor. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
May 2021
Your recent editing history at Ranger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
But you also seem to be involved in this edit war too, even after I have explained it to you.123.103.210.114 (talk) 06:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to Civil Police (San Marino), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- AsarteaTalk|Contribs10:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Heyy, I did not remove it. I merely transferred it to another section. Please don't accuse me.123.103.210.114 (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nayirah testimony, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nayirah testimony. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Ongoing problems with this editor
Yesterday I went through all of this IP's still standing edits, and found that almost every one needed a change, fix, improvement or reversion. Poor formatting and bare urls were the least of the problems. The pattern of editing, attitude and comments closely resembles 129.127.32.138, so I suspect the same editor is responsible, who is apparently unable or unwilling to learn some of the basics of Wikipedia editing even after hundreds of edits. If you carry on like this, you will continue to attract warnings and/or blocks, so I suggest that you either show some willingness to learn from your mistakes, or give up editing. You are wasting the valuable time of editors who are contributing in a worthwhile manner. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
It is not vandalism. Do not incorrectly label edits as vandalism. This has been discussed in the movie. As I said earlier, the edit is constructive.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Blocked for 1 year
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please see WP:NOTVAND and WP:NOTNEWS, and discuss your changes on these articles' talk pages. The information was removed because it is only tangentially related to a certain place. Every suicide and death at a certain location does not need to be recorded just because it happened, and reverting an article to the status quo version is not vandalism. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on USS North Carolina (SSN-777). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Came here to say the same thing. You made an edit, it wasn't comppletely undone, but some improvments were needed. Keep in mind, this was done so that the article could retain the image you added. Some editors would just remove it, and tbat could still happen. Anyway, per wp:brd and onus, if you wish to challenge the changes I made to your edit, then instead reverting, you need to go to the article talk page and start a discussion, and we'll see what/if any orher editors have to say. - wolf10:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Insert non-formatted text here[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Except that adding a news report is NOT considered Advertising you fking little weasel.
Personal attacks
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tailtalk11:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes I will. Just made nearly half a dozen edits using VPNs. And thank you Elon Musk for Starlink! 123.103.210.114 (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
July 2025
Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colorado have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
To edit, please log in.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coffeehouse. Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colorado have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2025 (UTC)