This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Philosophy: Literature / Religion / Mind / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Philosophy of religion Philosophy of mind Contemporary philosophy France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This page has been marked as needing a photograph. Christianity: Theology / Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

This is a very cool article and I have not read this book nor do I edit wiki. But in the reception section it states with regard to recent reception. “In an apparent inversion of this, the work has been reviewed approvingly both from the scientific[dubious – discuss] and the theological point of view in more recent years…”

There is no post 1960 citation until the bottom of the page(Sloan), this should at least be used as citation during this statement.

Additionally article previously cited a disapproving view by Dawkins. Directly contradicting the statement, if Dawkins is an accepted source then modern reception is mixed at best.

Cool stuff though whoever wrote this. Thanks 2001:569:6FDD:D824:8C01:C89A:18FB:6205 (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]