Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics
 | South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics is part of the South Sudan at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: History6042 (talk · contribs) 01:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Starting review momentarily. Z1720 (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- The date of Moris's heat is in the article, but not Guems. Why this difference?
- Recommend retrieval date for ref 10.
- Recommend running IA bot to archive sources
- Spot check, no concerns: refs 1, 2, 6, 11, 14
- What makes "Bleacher Report" (ref 2) reliable? I see that it is inconclusive at WP:RS/P searches, and I cannot find editorial information. I think the Guardian source (ref 1) covers the same information.
- What makes "World Athletics" (ref 10) a reliable source?
- Made some phrasing changes to the article: please revert if not helpful.
- Earwig check revealed no concerns.
Placing on hold until above are resolved. Z1720 (talk) 03:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- All
Done, except I can't find where World Athletics is used and IA bot isn't working for me but you said that's just a suggestion. Its showing up in the reflist but there is no inline citation. @Z1720 History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- World Athletics is now ref 9, which is used for the note. Z1720 (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed, @Z1720. I replaced it with New York Times. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- World Athletics is now ref 9, which is used for the note. Z1720 (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Pass. Congratulations. Please wait a few moments for everything to be updated. Z1720 (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.