Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hey, I'm going to try and review this following the rules for GA reviews at Good Article criteria. I'll leave comments on my review as I go along, feel free to respond to my comments under each one and remember to sign each response. Rudy 21:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y After a quick overview the article doesn't seem to fall into "quick-fail" criteria. Rudy 21:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Good standard coverage. Rudy 21:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Fine. Rudy 21:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• YYY Fantastic. The most well written article I've reviewed so far. Just a few very minor points but nothing like what I normally contend with, thank you! Rudy 01:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Paragraph 1, line 5 - Typo, needs to be "He escapes while on work duty"
• Para 2, ln 3 - Typo, "was left in the finished version"
• Para 2, ln 3 - Typo/grammar - should be "It was the first episode of The Simpsons to be directed by Dominic Polcino, who described it as being very difficult to direct."

• Para 1, last line - Typo, "because much of the dialogue had to be re-written."

• Y Fine. Rudy 01:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Fine. Rudy 01:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Fine. Rudy 01:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Perfect. Rudy 01:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Easiest review I've done. I want to get this passed now so I'm going to make the changes myself, they are only typos. Rudy 01:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED. And then some. Rudy 01:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]