Talk:List of Kakazai people

Reinstating Entries with Reliable Sources

I noticed that several names were removed from the List of Kakazai people due to a lack of sources in a previous edit. To improve the article's verifiability and alignment with Wikipedia's content policies, I have worked on enhancing the article with reliable citations where available.

Summary of Changes

  • Reinstated names that now have reliable sources, in compliance with WP:V and WP:RS.
  • For names where sources are not immediately available, I have added '[citation needed]' instead of removing them outright. This allows time for verification and encourages other editors to contribute reliable sources.
  • Maintained neutrality and factual accuracy to ensure compliance with WP:NOR and WP:NPOV.

Addressing Concerns About Name Removals

Several of these names have been widely associated with the Kakazai tribe across various online discussions and social platforms. However, I have adhered to Wikipedia's guidelines by only including names that meet the requirements of WP:V and WP:RS. Any remaining entries with '[citation needed]' tags are included to allow time for verification with reliable sources.

Discussion and Collaboration

If there are concerns about any specific names, I encourage discussion here before further removals to avoid content disputes per WP:CONSENSUS. The goal is to ensure that all entries meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability and notability, without prematurely deleting potentially valid content that may be verifiable with further research.

Looking forward to feedback from fellow editors to reach a consensus on any disputed entries.

Thank you.

McKhan (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]