This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Since the AfD discussion resulted in a keep, not a no consensus, that means that this article has been deemed sufficiently notable to have an article here. Unless I am misunderstanding something about AfD process...? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I have removed the tag. MickMacNee (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone mind explaining what is notable about the company? The article really doesn't make that clear at all. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 12:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:N: "[It] has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that because the article survived the AfD process that it cannot be tagged. Olana North (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was brought to the community for discussion, and the discussion resulted in a keep—the article's subject is notable. If there is disagreement so soon after an AfD, it should be brought to WP:DRV, not slapped with a "notability" tag. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]