GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 09:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cactusisme (talk · contribs) 02:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is ready as it met the 6 criteria
  2. It does not contain copyright violations
  3. It does not need cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid.
  4. It is stable

Hi @Cactusisme: is this review going to progress? If not, I would simply close the review and wait for another one (see WP:GAN/I#N4a). I hope things will move along soon - please mention if you're still interested (or not interested) please let me know. Thanks. Alexeyevitch(talk) 01:06, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch You can close for now, I didn't notice any issues so far. Thanks for your time. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, will do. Alexeyevitch(talk) 01:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.