This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Connecticut Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Nottinghamshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Jean Spademan's residence was not owned by any member of the Bethel Church in Mansfield Woodhouse or the King chapel in Norwich, CT. Please amend this information, if necessary proof can be given to show that the property in question was legally owned by Jean and Fred Spademan. ThanksWooptedoo (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-read the article. It is based on a newspaper article from May, 1999 from the New London Day, which is archived at http://www.rickross.com/reference/king/king07.html . The actual wording from the New London Day is that: "About a dozen homes on Ley Lane, where the Spademans live in Mansfield-Woodhouse, are owned by church members, Upton says." Perhaps it was misquoted by the Wikipedia Moderator, Cirt (talk · contribs), who rewrote the Wiki article based on these newspaper articles. But neither you nor I have the power to change the article, being too close to it. I have already been over my wp:Conflict of interest, which can be read in the archive here. o0pandora0o (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if the churches' name changes can be added to the article. King's Chapel is now Peniel, and Bethel is now The International Church Mansfield. The names have changed, but not the pastors. If you changed Cujo's name after he killed people, would he not still be the same dog? o0pandora0o (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]